Remove 2013 Remove Advertising Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

The Importance of Transparency in Research Integrity

Plagiarism Today

Earlier this week, the journal BMC Medicine announced that it will not retract a controversial 2013 paper authored by botanist Steven Newmaster. The paper, originally published in 2013, brought Newmaster to prominence in the field of botany and led to massive amounts of not just academic success, but also entrepreneurial success.

article thumbnail

Sweet respite for Cadbury as the High Court partially upholds its appeal

The IPKat

In the decision by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 2013, it was held that due to the word ‘predominant’, the mark could not be a singular sign, but rather would grant a right to multiple signs, which could take different forms and appearances. Images of the marks are in the public domain. the packaging is purple).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

13 Spooky Copyright Cases, Just in Time for Halloween

Copyright Lately

“The Conjuring” (2013). It found that because Harvey had not renewed the copyrights on the comics featuring the character that later developed into Fatso, the depictions of the character relied on by Harvey had fallen into the public domain. The lawsuit, Brittle v. Warner Bros. The Ghostly Trio.

Copyright 144
article thumbnail

Time for the 12 O'Clock Boyz to go: court shuts down (c)/TM lawsuit against documentary & feature film about Baltimore bikers

43(B)log

Nathan directed the allegedly infringing 2013 Documentary, which “tells the story of Pug, a thirteen-year-old child who wants to be a ‘12 O’Clock Boy,’ just like [he] has repeatedly watched in [the 2001 and 2003 Documentaries].” Defendants' 2013 documentary Both parties’ works are “docu-fiction” set in Baltimore. Nathan, F.Supp.3d

article thumbnail

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

LexBlog IP

9] In reaching that determination, the court relied chiefly on the Second Circuit’s 2013 decision in Cariou v. precisely replicat[ing] a copyrighted advertising logo to make a comment about consumerism’ (such as Warhol’s well-known depictions of Campbell’s soup cans), which ‘might. fall within the scope of fair use.’” Id.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

The Court noted that redacting one’s name from a judgment acquitting them is counterproductive when there are other tarnishing publications in the public domain and that access to court judgments are integral to “open justice”, subject only to some exceptions. Top 10 Judgments/Orders [Jurisprudence/Legal Lucidity].

IP 143
article thumbnail

A Master(s) Class in Genuine Use? UK IPO rejects revocation action, finding genuine use of registration for gin

The IPKat

If so, read on… Pawing over the evidence… Background On 21 st June 2013, Destileras M.G., For example, there was a lack of evidence in relation to the distribution of advertising and marketing evidence, and the only evidence of turnover submitted was comprised of seventeen invoices. Pictures on lower middle are in the public domain.