This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Evo’s design patent claims an “ ornamental design for a foldable bag ” as shown in the figures above. Functionality : Design patents focus on ornamentality rather than utility. Although the design must be ornamental, it is simultaneously a “design for an article of manufacture.”
On October 30, 2013, a German company applied to the German Trade Mark Office (DPMA) for a word mark “Black Friday”. On December 20, 2013, the trade mark was registered for a large number of goods and services in classes 9, 35 and 41. However, continued the Federal Patent Court, the wording of Sec.
As part of the course pedagogy, two question papers from 2013 and 2016 will be solved and methods to draft claims, specification, and abstract will be discussed. Participants can also send in their solved questions from the years 2013 and 2016 and they will get individual feedback. may be addressed to eoffice@techlaw.in.
CIVC affirmed that “Champanillo” constituted an evocation of PDO “Champagne”, which is considered an infringement under Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. In considering the case, the Barcelona Appeal Court expressed uncertainty regarding the interpretation of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and so it requested for a preliminary ruling (case C?783/19
Julius Bencko, Graphic Designer In the United States government’s superseding indictment dated February 16, 2012, Julius Bencko is described as a citizen and resident of Slovakia. With his former colleagues’ names rarely out of the media for long, Bencko spent much of 2012 and early 2013 retweeting news about the Megaupload case.
A Registered Community Design (‘RCD’) enjoys protection only if it is new and has individual character vis-à-vis designs disclosed prior to its filing or priority date ( Art. 4(1), 7 of Regulation 6/2002 , ‘Design Regulation’). 7(1) Design Regulation ). 7(1) Design Regulation ). 6 of Directive 2005/29/EC.
A new lawsuit filed in the United States this week reveals that while that particular effort didn’t achieve its key goal (aside from identifying an IP address in Texas), it hasn’t deterred the MPA from going ahead with a new lawsuit designed to bring PrimeWire to its knees. Advertising and Referral Schemes.
Beginning with the Desirable Corporate Governance Code in 1998 and continuing through Chapter 11 of the Companies Act of 2013 , the idea of the independent director has been welcomed nearly universally. Duties of Directors Under the Indian Companies Act, 2013 – iPleaders.” 1 July 2021 Available at [link]. [2] 4] Pandey, Anubhav.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. 4) Social media “defective design” lawsuits go forward.
Slightly altered image of a Kat Facts In 2013, the RATP commissioned Amo Films to design and produce a collection of three photographic books. This judgment provides an opportunity to examine the concept of originality as applied to photographs, and also to understand what may constitute an infringement of moral rights.
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
The dominance of Google and Facebook in the digital ad market raises particular concerns, but that is a competition issue, not a news one and requiring the companies to pay for news based primarily on having developed a more successful digital advertising platform is not a supportable policy. A sampling would include: AllNovaScotia.
24, 2023) Courts in particular kinds of false advertising cases say that scientific claims are not falsifiable, even as the majority of workaday false advertising claims involving scientific fact are (correctly) treated as falsifiable. American Soc’y of Anesthesiologists, Inc., 4th -, 2023 WL 2621131, No. 22-1411 (3d Cir.
Serious Comparative Advertising: Broadening the Definition. In this guest post , Sangita Sharma analyses the law around comparative advertisements in India. She contends that the ‘fair’ and ‘honest’ use thresholds under Section 30(1)(a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act should come to the rescue of such advertisements. Other Posts.
In re Hulting , 107 USPQ2d 1175, 1180 (TTAB 2013). Applicant did not provide direct evidence of acquired distinctiveness, such as survey evidence or consumer declarations, but instead relied on circumstantial evidence regarding its length of use, advertising expenditures, sales, and number of users.
Samsung : This was a case, from 2011 to 2018, where Apple took the word against Samsung, claiming infringement of its smartphone design and utility patents. 2] Adidas vs. The lawsuit raised an understanding of the value of enduring trademarks and the perils of “knock-off” designs. FAMOUS CASES OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 1.Foreign
A very popular design of one of these boots is based on a traditional Spanish riding boot - the Regina boot or Heeled Regina - which looks like the below (and for a closer look click here ). Although their products have the "country" look and feel about them, the products aren't designed for serious country wear.
The operative claims were false designation of origin/false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act and coordinate state-law claims. Thus, plaintiff couldn’t show falsity for false designation of origin/false advertising. The other defendants, Hollandia, Heritage, and Saputo, supplied products to MGDH. the origin.
According to the EUIPO case-law ( R-1489/2017 , R-788/2013 ), smileys or emojis are typically used in both advertising and private communication to express positive emotions. The surge in the use of emoji and emoticons in online and digital communication prompts inquiries about their potential to serve as trade marks.
In a 51-page opinion, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the product configuration shown below, for "handbags," finding the design to be generic and, alternatively, lacking in acquired distinctiveness: "Handbags embodying the proposed mark are so common in the industry that such product design is not capable of indicating source and.
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
This suggestion was confirmed by Opposer's advertising, which "touts the California sunshine under which Opposer’s citrus fruits are grown." Opposer submitted sales and marketing expenditures for fresh fruit from 2013 to 2021 and for carbonated soda from 2007 to 2021. Sunkist Growers, Inc. Intrastate Distributors, Inc. Opposition No.
Respondent established a first use date of December 2013. Petitioner sunk its own claim that its marks acquired distinctiveness in 2008 by testifying that its sales that year were $256; furthermore there were no advertising expenditures during 2008-2010. Natural Dog Acquisition LLC v. Pet Go Round of Greensboro , Cancellation No.
Nathan directed the allegedly infringing 2013 Documentary, which “tells the story of Pug, a thirteen-year-old child who wants to be a ‘12 O’Clock Boy,’ just like [he] has repeatedly watched in [the 2001 and 2003 Documentaries].” Defendants' 2013 documentary Both parties’ works are “docu-fiction” set in Baltimore. Nathan, F.Supp.3d
The Plaintiffs highlighted specific instances where the Defendants falsely represented themselves as the Plaintiffs when applying for work for the Kenya Film Commission’s Technical Proposal KFC/OT/05/2013/2014 by using the Plaintiffs’ trademark ‘ACAL' without the Plaintiffs’ authority or consent.
Per the Complaint, Plaintiffs have used the getGo® trademark since at least March 2013 and have sought and secured federal trademark registrations for various getGo® trademarks and logos as set forth below (the “getGo® Marks”). The acquired stores allegedly include four former Rickers stores in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Registration No.
In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. The IJR “article generated approximately $2 to $3 in advertising revenue for IJR based on the number of page views it received.” The defendant did not give the specified attribution.
Communication of conceptual design to the public will not mean prior publication of the design, clarifies Delhi High Court. The court further held that mere communication of the concept of a design does not constitute prior publication. Case: Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt.
24/2013, and Federal Law No. Strict regulations on tobacco and vaping advertisements. The competent authority may designate specific smoking and vaping areas subject to conditions outlined in the Implementing Regulation. 24/2013 Concerning Regulations of Federal Law No. 24/2013 Concerning Regulations of Federal Law No.
However, Black & Decker did not in fact design, manufacture, distribute, or warrant the coffeemaker. The district court certified a class of those who purchased the coffeemaker at a New Mexico Wal-Mart store from 2009 to 2013, approximately 40,600 members. The coffeemaker evidently proved unsatisfactory, and the Pumas sued.
The Court held that the use of the Google Ads program undisputedly qualifies as advertising, which falls under Indian trademark law. Several petitions in the Madras High Court challenged the validity of rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, 2013. Merck Sharp and Dohme v. SMS Pharmaceuticals [Delhi High Court]. Saregama India Limited v.
The name Haldiram has become synonymous with the aforementioned logo designs. As a result, the plaintiff brought a suit against the defendants under Section 16(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. 3500 crores were the advertisement expenses and Rs. The defendants incorporated a company by the name “Haldiram Restro Pvt.
PGI “Nürnberger Rostbratwürste”, relying on the previous Regulation (EU) 1151/2012 , argued that the size and the shape of these mini sausages infringed its rights to the PGI in that: the name, the packaging and the online advertising of “Mini Rostbratwürstchen” is an evocation of PGI “Nürnberger Rostbratwürste” (Art. 13(1)(b), now Art.
The humanized skeleton figure on the left is Skully, which artist and entrepreneur Gregory Spiers first conceived while designing a T-shirt for the Lithuanian Olympic basketball team. The humanized skeleton figure on the right is Curly, a character designed for Scholastic’s popular “Goosebumps” series of books.
In 2013, Cadbury’s registration for Pantone 2685C was held invalid because its description rendered it void for lack of certainty. This form of words was very like the version which failed in 2013 but with the most offending word therein, “predominant”, removed. It is not clear why, but Nestle did not appeal this decision.
Regardless, it sent a cease and desist to the defendants in 2022 who have a shop in Jaipur with a similar name and have registered the word mark in 2013. The Defendant on the other hand relied on the exception of the lack of novelty of the Plaintiff’s design and argued that there are many designs similar to the Plaintiff’s design.
MHCS submitted a vast amount of information on sales figures, market share, the duration of use (dating back to the 19th century) and advertising material. The picture was created with Image Creator from Microsoft Designer. Lidl argued inter alia that the evidence for Portugal and Greece was insufficient. 209(4)(a) EUTMR ).
But for famed wedding dress designer, Hayley Paige Gutman, she certainly is ruing the Second Circuit’s recent decision to revive its 1999 holding of Ticor Title Ins. JLM”), to serve as a wedding, bridesmaid, and evening gown dress designer for JLM. As is often true in fashion, what once was old is now new again. Cohen , 173 F.3d
The Copyright , Designs and Patents Act of 1988 in the United Kingdom specifies in Section (1)(1)(a) that copyright exists in “original literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works.” Both engaged in fierce competition for Yellow Pages advertising. It was written with a distinct style and message. 1] [1916] 2 Ch 601. [2] 4] 499 U.S.
WCT’s app was first released in 2014 for the iPhone and Pebble watch as a metric-tracking cycling app that was designed to “track speed, distance, altitude, and grade.” WCT’s Bike+ mark started as an ITU application on November 23, 2013 for “Downloadable mobile applications for recording and managing cycling activities.”
However, Sections 280 [8] and 284 [9] of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 compare agents to solicitors and grant them an equal privilege in terms of documentation, communication and information. 8] Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, § 280, No. 9] Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, § 284, No.
In other words, copyright does not prevent others from creating a similar software program or user interface, as long as they do not copy the original code or design. 2013, the Patent Office issued further guidelines and set forth that inventions involving a technical effect or those which solved a technical problem were patentable.
from Santa Clara University School of Law in 2013, his Ph.D. Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. He received his J.D.
The authors also look to lawmakers at the federal and state levels, who considered a variety of legislative proposals relating to biologics and biosimilars designed to improve patient access, encourage commercialization, and reduce costs. Companies are already taking advantage of these new designations. Biosimilar Regulatory Updates.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content