This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Originally posted 2012-12-21 06:00:01. Republished by Blog Post PromoterOriginally posted March 30, 2012. The Second Circuit, just yesterday (March 29, 2012) has issued an opinion called Louis Vuitton v. 08-4483-cv(L)) sure to bring joy to the hearts of trademark counterfeiting enforcers everywhere. Ly USA, Inc. (08-4483-cv(L))
A public survey was submitted as verification of this assertion, and the equivalent was granted on 1 st October 2012 after a long-drawn-out legal battle with the Swiss multinational food and drink processing conglomerate, Nestle. Colgate Palmolive Company vs. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. For more visit: [link].
Dollar Financial holds registered trademarks for MONEY MART – the name it uses for its payday and title loan venders as well as pawn shops and pawn brokerages. The company had been using the name for several years in the payday loan business, and in 2012 expanded into pawn shops and then filed for registration for that usage in 2013.
C Union of India (2012). Therefore, the Court’s approach amounts to an unsubstantiated piercing of the corporate veil while not taking into account relevant principles and case laws. Existing trademarklaws sufficiently address online infringement without needing a new “e-infringement” category.
A member of the California, Federal Circuit Bar, and US Supreme Court bars, Ghosh was elected to the American Law Institute in 2012 and is currently a member of the advisory board on the Restatement of Copyright. Ragavan’s scholarship emphasizes issues intersecting international trade law with intellectual property rights.
In 2012, the Meenaxi registered the two word marks with the USPTO (THUMS UP & LIMCA). A case like this begins with the territorial doctrine of trademarklaw: Under the territoriality doctrine, a trademark is recognized as having a separate existence in each sovereign territory in which it is registered or legally recognized as a mark.
For its part, WOTC claims that it retains common law interest in these marks, on the basis that it has continued to use the marks since at least 2012. In its injunction motion, WOTC considers criteria based on the trademark application examination process under US law.
Originally posted 2012-03-30 14:37:51. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe Second Circuit, just yesterday (March 29, 2012) has issued an opinion called Louis Vuitton v. 08-4483-cv(L)) sure to bring joy to the hearts of trademark counterfeiting enforcers everywhere. Ly USA, Inc. (08-4483-cv(L))
Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2020: [link]. 2012: [link]. The firm has registered more than 3,500 U.S. 2019: [link].
Erik Pelton® has been making trademarks bloom since 1999 ® as the founder of Erik M. Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2021: [link].
million,” showing that despite government agency efforts, the prevalence of counterfeit merchandise that infringes on sports team trademarks remains a constant problem. ii) Policy rationales behind trademarklaw and their application in the sprots apparel context. In Scandia Down Corp. Euroquilt, Inc. ,
This case comes in when the Retrolympics applied for the word and the figurative mark Retroolympic at the German Patent and Trademark Office in 2012 (for Nice classes 28 (games and sporting goods); 35 (advertising) and 41 (sporting and cultural activities). [Image Source: Getty Images]. Facts of the case.
For instance, in 2012 Kodak used its facial recognition patent, among its other IPs, as collateral when it was facing bankruptcy. The whole patent portfolio of the company, at the time of their auction, was reported at a whopping 2 billion USD in 2012!
Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2019: [link]. 2012: [link]. The firm has registered more than 3,000 U.S. 2018: [link]. 2017: [link].
After law school, Brent worked both for Vorys Sater and then the USDOJ before being recruited as Senior Counsel by Sen Boxer where he spent lots of time on the America Invents Act. Since 2012, Brent has been working as in-house counsel or doing similar consulting work.
We are pleased to bring to you a guest post by Naman Keswani on the concept of naked licensing within trademarkslaw. Naman is a fourth-year student at the Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur who has a keen interest in Intellectual Property Law, especially TrademarkLaw.
A dispute has emerged between the NFL, the Las Vegas Raiders, and the Dimopoulos Law Firm over the NFL and the Raiders threatening to sue the firm for trademark infringement. The law firm claims it has been using a black and silver color scheme to promote its services since its inception in 2012.
Originally posted 2012-06-26 21:23:42. Get the story here. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The post March Madness appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
He was unmistakably aware of the nuances regarding colours in trademarklaw. Broadly speaking, trademarks are of two types: traditional and non-traditional. [1] Notwithstanding the essence of this finding, this is too narrow an interpretation of the true spirit of trademarklaw. Anubaker CS (COMM) No.890/2018
Originally posted 2012-12-27 06:00:01. Jane Coleman’s definitive online treatise Secondary Trademark Infringement has recently been updated […] The post Best of 2010: Gucci v. Republished by Blog Post PromoterFirst posted July 12, 2010. Frontline Processing Corp., 2010 WL 2541367 (S.D.N.Y.),
com” at after a generic word, “Booking,” still makes “Booking.com” generic within traditional trademarklaw [xiv] and (2) the fact consumer identify “Booking.com” doesn’t change the fact that it is still generic and thus ineligible for trademark registration. [xv] 1013, 1015-1016 (2012). xxix] Robert C. Bird & Joel H.
scores trademark coup with Beatles’ label logos Originally posted 2012-03-18 14:49:21. Nice little bit of journalism here: Apple Inc. Republished by Blog Post Promoter. The post Getting to the core of the Apple / Beatles TM settlement appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
While doing so, the Court disregarded many of the foreign judgements cited by Google which held invisible use of trademarks as failing to constitute infringement; and highlighted the stark differences in trademarklaw in each jurisdiction, especially when compared to India. 194 (2012) DLT 23; Amway India Enterprises Pvt.
The] evidence indicates that there was bona fide domestic use of the CS mark on amplifiers in the ordinary course of trade from 2012 through 2015. In the 2012-2015 period, Respondent’s domestic sales, measured in dollar amounts, were in the five-to-six figure range annually. Lanham Act, Section 45.
431, 446 (2012); see also Shammas v. McCarthy , the leading treatise on trademarklaw explains that “[t]he concepts of ‘generic name’ and ‘trademark’ are mutually exclusive. If they do, the district court “must make de novo factual findings that take account of both the new evidence and the administrative record.”
Generic terms are incapable of functioning as registrable trademarks denoting source, and are not registrable on the Supplemental Register or on the Principal Register after having acquired secondary meaning. This protected designation was superseded by adoption of the Protected Designation of Origin (“PDO”) for GRUYÈRE in 2001.
Moreover, in 2012, the USPTO received several patent applications that contained the terms “cryptocurrency” and “blockchain”. However, the UK and Spain Patents and Trademark office granted trademark protection to the ‘Bitcoin’ mark and its logo (Registration number: M4046141).
billion fine issued by the European Commission and considering the lack of a consolidated competition law in the UAE, businesses here may have been excused for being tempted to focus only on their competitive activities related to operations in Europe. However, with the publication on 23 October 2012 of UAE Federal Law No.
The book, a follow on edition from the 2012 1st edition of Overlapping IP Rights is once again a masterclass in thinking through the oft under discussed spheres of overlaps in IP, this time with additional subject areas and updated developments. Their focus of jurisdiction is EU, German law, and US law.
Catchphrases in Copyright and TrademarkLaw Copyright law guarantees artists the protection of their creative work while allowing others to expand upon it through its legislations. iv] 2012(51)PTC 251(Del). [v] iii] §13, The Coyright Act, 1957. [iv] v] 2007 (34) PTC 164 (Karnataka).
More pain, very little gain — besides for lawyers’ college funds — in the roiling world of trademark fair use. Originally posted 2012-09-10 06:00:30. Republished by Blog Post Promoter. The post Unfair use appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
Name saturation is an existential challenge for every industry that harnesses trademarklaw to protect its brand. A study published in 2018 found that overall incidents of drug name confusion of all types had decreased when comparing two periods, 2000-2004 and 2012-2016 1.
Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. This is the latest entry in a long-running legal battle between Hayley Paige Gutman, a bridalwear designer, and JLM Couture, her one-time employer. Kravitz An Update on PhoneDog v.
More recently in 2020, Sankalp Jain discussed the copyright challenges in “Dreams,” a video game enabling user-generated content, arguing for the Indian copyright law’s limitations in addressing the the issues around the fan-made creations within the game. Relevant here are Arun C. That’s all from my end. (By
Generic terms are incapable of functioning as registrable trademarks denoting source, and are not registrable on the Supplemental Register or on the Principal Register after having acquired secondary meaning. The European Union recognized the PDO in 2011 in an agreement between the European Union and Switzerland in 2011.
Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand. Under trademarklaw, however, phrases are frequently deemed not to disclose the commercial origin of products or services, which is a trademark’s primary role.
There were no witnesses produced by the defendant even after filing its evidence by way of an affidavit, which was recorded by the Joint Registrar in 2012, and thereafter the defendant had stayed away from the proceedings. patent law disputes where the court has calculated notional damages on the basis of publicly available information.
1) He made this request on grounds including trademarklaw and unfair competition law. The Civil Code applies: where article 65 leaves gaps; and where it would not be incompatible with the legislative spirit of Law 2121/1993. (5) 7) CJEU, C-406/2010, ECLI:EU:C:2012:259, paragraph 33. 5) Supreme Court 484/2020. (6)
In this article, I have analyzed how personal names be granted protection under the trademarklaw. 893/2002 Delhi High Court Decided on 29.04.2010 Tata Sons Limited & Anr vs Aniket Singh CS/OS 681/2012 Delhi High Court Decided on 17.11.2015 Goenka Institute Of Education & Research vs Anjani Kumar Goenka FAO (OS) No.
Canada— Since the 2012 Federal Court decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v Attorney General Of Canada ( T-1650-10), sound marks have been registrable in Canada, as noted here ; and. As with any other kind of trade mark, a sound must first meet the basic requirements for registrability set out in the Act.’
Second , it has been argued that the court merely espoused the settled principles of trademarklaw that ‘common’ names and phrases cannot be monopolized. 66 (2012), and Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc.,
However, it may be more appropriate to consider trademarklaw as a comparable framework for comprehending the extent of the personality right. Author: Tanushree Behera, A Student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us at support@ipandlegalfilings.com or IP & Legal Filing.
Aditya Gupta is a lawyer by training and is presently working on issues that fall at the intersection of IP law, freedom of expression, and business strategy. His primary focus is on trademarklaw and the intersection of finance and social networks. Vijay V Venkitesh is a data scientist and Research Associate at IIMA.
Through various case laws, the scope of publicity rights has been expanded by the Indian judiciary. The Trade Marks Act, 1999 governs trademarklaw in India and provides for the registration, protection, and enforcement of trademarks. Under this Act, Sec. For instance, in Titan Industries Ltd.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content