article thumbnail

Patent Infringement, Antitrust, and the Discovery Rule

IP Watchdog

The complaint alleged that Scientific Games, through its acquired entity, SHFL Entertainment, brought patent infringement litigation in 2009 and 2012 based on fraudulently obtained patents for automatic card shufflers used in licensed casinos. The plaintiffs had sued Scientific Games Corp.

article thumbnail

CJEU clarifies jurisdiction rules for European patent enforcement: BSH Hausgeräte vs. Electrolux AB

The IPKat

The CJEU found that national courts maintain jurisdiction over infringement claims against defendants domiciled in their territory, even when invalidity of foreign patents is raised. BSH alleged that Electrolux infringed its EP1434512 (relating to vacuum cleaners) which was validated in certain EU states and Turkey.

Patent 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Manhattan Jury Orders Nintendo to Pay $30 Million for Patent Infringement

Greenspoon Marder LLP

million in damages to Tomita Technologies for patent infringement. After leaving the company, he applied for the patent in issue in March of 2003, and the patent was issued in 2008 licensed to Tomita Technologies. In 2012, U.S. By: Sharon Urias, Esq. A Manhattan jury earlier this month ordered Nintendo to pay $30.2

article thumbnail

A patent small claims court – what do you think?

Patently-O

small claims patent court. Most recently, in December 2012, the USPTO. the United States should develop a small claims proceeding for patent. 18, 2012)). consider in designing a small claims patent court. The Department of Commerce has also considered the possibility of a. enforcement’’ (77 FR 74830 (Dec.

Patent 111
article thumbnail

Judicial Recusal Order Saves Cisco $2.75 Billion

Patently-O

billion patent infringement loss with a recusal order based upon the fact that the Judge’s spouse owned $5,000 in Cisco stock. . 291, 298 (2012).” by Dennis Crouch. Cisco has escaped its $2.75 Centripetal Networks, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Judge Dyk wrote this opinion ordering the recusal of E.D. Judge Henry C.

article thumbnail

I was already like this before you got here: prior use as an exception to patent infringement

Garrigues Blog

In an earlier blog, we discussed “prior public use” as grounds for opposing the grant of European patents (see here ). In addition, a third party’s use of an invention before its registration by another is also relevant to assess patent infringement. 201/2012, of 28 May 2012 ). 65/2001, of January 31, 2001 ).

article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Directs Maharaja to Pay a King’s Ransom in a Patent Infringement Suit  

SpicyIP

Putting an end to a 24 year old patent infringement suit, the Delhi High Court has directed Maharaja Appliances Ltd. This was used by the court to issue a retrospective finding that the defendant had been selling the infringing products “openly and intensively” for a period of two years between 2007 to 2009.