Remove 2012 Remove Marketing Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Anti-Trust & Big Tech Market

IP and Legal Filings

This expanding impact of Big Tech within and outside the market has regulators increasingly concerned about economic problems, prevention of competition, data privacy issues, media domination as well as political concerns, and even the democratic process itself. Demystification of Shri Sonam Sharma v Apple Inc. &

article thumbnail

2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

However, those arguments were more theoretical than empirical; there weren’t a lot of high-profile examples of a mass-market consumer service deploying this strategy. Despite these obvious issues, the privacy community has been conspicuously quiet about age authentication. Musk has bridged that gap. TikTok bans.

Law 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Interplay of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression- the Jackie Shroff’s Case’

IP and Legal Filings

However, the twin concepts of privacy and publicity rights are gradually evolving through judicial interpretations. The right to publicity refers to the right to protect, control, and profit from one’s image, name, or likeness, and it is frequently considered as a subset of the right to privacy. Puttaswamy (Privacy-9J.)

article thumbnail

Navigating the Patent Maze: Challenges and Controversies in Emerging Technologies

IP and Legal Filings

Monopolies raise ethical issues because a few organizations command a disproportionate amount of market power that may stifle competition and inhibit innovation. Bharat Bhogilal Patel (2012), citing lack of creative step and in fact, all of these claims and specifications rested on previously published discoveries.

article thumbnail

Memelords unite! Eighth Circuit rejects fair use of meme in Griner v. King

The IPKat

Copyright Office in 2012, proceeded to sue the Congressman together with the Committee for copyright infringement and for violation of her son’s privacy. Due to the unauthorized use of the meme template, Griner, who had already registered it with the U.S. King's original post. Goldsmith and Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music , Inc.,

article thumbnail

Anil Kapoor Vs Simply Life India & Ors: An Unwavering Assurance In Safeguarding Personality Rights Against Ai

IP and Legal Filings

Union of India [1] , established that privacy is an essential Fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Unauthorised use of someone’s identity is a violation of both their personality rights and their basic right to privacy. The Court rejected the privacy defence, which is often employed in IP proceedings.

article thumbnail

First duel between NFTs and copyright before the Spanish courts: NFTs 1 – Authors 0

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Furthermore, it is debatable whether the creation of NFTs can be considered “fair use”, since (i) this generates a “new” public and a new “digital” market for artworks that, to date, only existed in the real world and (ii) it deprives de facto copyright holders of a potential source of income.

Copyright 125