Remove 2012 Remove False Advertising Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Chanel reseller can't get summary judgment on whether it talked too much about Chanel

43(B)log

28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, false advertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and false advertising. Until 2017, it also used the hashtag #WGACACHANEL in its social media posts.

article thumbnail

9th Circuit courts are very committed to letting juries hear testimony about surveys

43(B)log

2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the false advertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Models' false endorsement claims fail for want of recognition, bad survey

43(B)log

Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various social media platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered social media influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,

article thumbnail

11th Circuit affirms Viacom's Rogers-based win for MTV Floribama Shore

43(B)log

An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted social media posts. Plaintiffs’ social media expert opined that the show meant that Internet searches for “Florabama” or “Flora-Bama” led to “blurred” results filled with MTV Floribama Shore content. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court reasoned that when the Act was amended in 2012 – internet broadcasting was not alien to India and if the Legislature intended Section 31D to apply to internet broadcasting, it would’ve done so by specifically amending the provision. Ltd and Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Music Broadcast Ltd. d) Other IP Developments 1.

IP 124
article thumbnail

Rogers v. Grimaldi lives on, at least for work content

43(B)log

26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, false advertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. 3d 1266 (2012) (sports art), and Louis Vuitton Malletier S. Netflix, Inc., MCA Records, Inc.,