Remove 2012 Remove Fair Use Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Memelords unite! Eighth Circuit rejects fair use of meme in Griner v. King

The IPKat

case concerning the creation and dissemination of a meme on social media saw the Court of Appeals clarify that “the fact that everyone else is doing it is not a particularly compelling justification” for the fair use doctrine under 17 U.S.C. § Now, adding one more nail to the coffin of the #SaveOurMemes movement, a U.S.

article thumbnail

Plagiarism as a Social Norm

Plagiarism Today

As gray area as the law can be, especially in areas like fair use and determining what is “substantially similar”, the law is codified, written down and has tomes of case law behind it. In April 2021, researcher Jess L Gregory published an article entitled “ Plagiarism as a Social Contract, a New Way to Approach Plagiarism ”.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Digitalization And Copyright Law

IP and Legal Filings

In India particularly, the Copyrights Act, 1957 was enacted to prevent copyright infringement and recently the amendment act of 2012 was introduced to combat the changing needs of copyright law. In such provisions, the concept ‘fair use’ of copyrighted work is provided which allows the fair use of some original works in certain cases.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 27 – February 2)

SpicyIP

Is training of GenAI models fair use? The defendants were accused of illegally uploading copyrighted works online on social media and other online private groups. The Court ruled that since the agreement in question was signed in 1980, the Copyright Amendments made in 2012 did not apply to the case in question.

article thumbnail

If You Ask Your Friend to Take Your Photo Using Your Camera, Who Owns the Copyright?–Shah v. NYP

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

While there, he preset the settings on his phone camera (including shutter speed, white balance, ISO, metering type, and exposure value) and asked friends or bystanders to use his phone to take photos of him with celebrities. In 2012, the FBI arrested Shah for extortion, which sparked news coverage.

Copyright 124
article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. 511, 523 (2012). Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] vii] Deidrè A. viii] See, e.g., Lee J.

article thumbnail

Chanel reseller can't get summary judgment on whether it talked too much about Chanel

43(B)log

30,000 Chanel labels, stickers, and authenticity cards bearing unique serial numbers were stolen from its Renato Corti factory in 2012. It can use its system to determine whether the type, color, and characteristics of an alleged product correspond with those of the genuine product Chanel manufactured and sold under that serial number.