2012 Copying Fair Use Licensing 
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 27, 2021
The Doctrine of Fair Use is a concept that originates from the case of Folsom vs. Marsh. Justice Story observed in his judgement, when the courts of law decide on cases like this, they must look to the nature and objects of the selection mode, the quantity and value of material used. Percentage of Original Material Used.
Kashishipr
JUNE 9, 2021
With the onset of the trend wherein users are gradually switching to online streaming to meet their music needs and discarding traditional methods such as radio, television, and music CDs, compulsory licensing for the internet was recognized as a key policy issue by the music industry last year. Background. The Plaintiff, Tips Industries Ltd.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Michael Geist
FEBRUARY 21, 2023
Canadian copyright lobby groups have relentlessly lobbied the government to overturn decades of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence, seeking unprecedented restrictions on fair dealing that include eliminating it for educational institutions if a licence is available. These claims are grounded in multiple inaccuracies.
IP and Legal Filings
JULY 21, 2022
Among the other solutions, the most easy and feasible way to come out of the problem of unavailability and unaffordability was to start copying the books, study materials, and video lectures with the help of different mechanisms. The exceptions in fair dealing have been stated in general terms and the list is not exhaustive.
IPilogue
OCTOBER 4, 2021
Photocopying classroom materials in a K-12 public school system may have seemed harmless and benign before the 2012 Supreme Court of Canada case, Alberta v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright). Despite its benefits, copying materials can present consequences for the content’s owners, artists, and publishers.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. This is demonstrated by corporations repeatedly using memes and meme culture, albeit to varying degrees of success.
43(B)log
AUGUST 12, 2021
IP derives much of its value from opportunity to license, so it often makes sense to think of reasonable royalty as a cognizable harm. By contrast, elsewhere it might not make as much sense to think of the problem as a lost opportunity to license, e.g., the listing of someone as a terrorist. Maybe it took some years to take effect.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content