Remove 2012 Remove Contracts Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

More Chaos in the Law of Online Contract Formation

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Another 3k+ word post about the jurisprudential chaos in online contract formation law. But ultimately, the onus is on Disney to create a contract formation process so conspicuous that a court can’t reach decisions like this. ”” In 2012, PayPal added a mandatory arbitration clause that users could opt-out-of.

article thumbnail

China v. Colombia privacy regulations

Olartemoure Blog

Statutory act 1581 de 2012. 3 Article 3(c) of Law 1581 of 2012. Sensitive Data is defined as the personal data that affects the privacy of the Data Subject or whose inadequate use may lead to discrimination against the Data Subject. Article 5, Law 1581 of 2012. Article 5, Law 1581 of 2012. Regulation.

Privacy 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Then he reversed course on remand and ruled in favor of LinkedIn on its breach of contract claims. On January 23rd, Judge Chen once again dropped a bombshell for the web-scraping world (and those looking to stop it) by ruling in favor of Bright Data and against Meta on its breach of contract claims at summary judgment. Bright Data Ltd.

article thumbnail

Void vs. Voidable: The Distinction That Can Make or Break a Tortious Interference Claim in Light of the Great Resignation

LexBlog IP

For example, many employers do not know they may still be liable for interference with an unenforceable contract when hiring an employee subject to a restrictive covenant like a non-compete. ” An unenforceable contract may be voidable by a counter-party to the contract without being void and, thus, may be the subject of interference.

article thumbnail

Here’s the basics to avoid penalties if you manage personal data in China and Colombia

Olartemoure Blog

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Colombia have their own laws and regulations to protect the privacy and personal data. The protection of personal data in Colombia is mainly regulated by: i) Law 1581 of 2012 and ii) the Regulatory Decree 1074 of 2015 in its chapter 25, among other rules that develop it. Sensitive Data v.

Privacy 52
article thumbnail

[Guest post] China Passes Its First Comprehensive Data Protection Law

The IPKat

Upon that, The IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post co-authored by Anja Geller (PhD candidate at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) and Zihao Li (PhD candidate at CREATe, University of Glasgow, on privacy and data protection in the Chinese Civil Code).

Law 97
article thumbnail

Courts Still Have No Clue How to Determine Who Owns Social Media Accounts–JLM v. Gutman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. Johnson The Spectacular Failure of Employee Social Media Privacy Laws Do Employers Own LinkedIn Groups Created By Employees?–CDM CH When Does A Parody Twitter Account Constitute Criminal Identity Theft?