2012 Contracts Privacy 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 11, 2023
Another 3k+ word post about the jurisprudential chaos in online contract formation law. But ultimately, the onus is on Disney to create a contract formation process so conspicuous that a court can’t reach decisions like this. ”” In 2012, PayPal added a mandatory arbitration clause that users could opt-out-of.
Olartemoure Blog
NOVEMBER 11, 2022
Statutory act 1581 de 2012. 3 Article 3(c) of Law 1581 of 2012. Sensitive Data is defined as the personal data that affects the privacy of the Data Subject or whose inadequate use may lead to discrimination against the Data Subject. Article 5, Law 1581 of 2012. Article 5, Law 1581 of 2012. Regulation.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 25, 2024
Then he reversed course on remand and ruled in favor of LinkedIn on its breach of contract claims. On January 23rd, Judge Chen once again dropped a bombshell for the web-scraping world (and those looking to stop it) by ruling in favor of Bright Data and against Meta on its breach of contract claims at summary judgment. Bright Data Ltd.
LexBlog IP
MAY 9, 2022
For example, many employers do not know they may still be liable for interference with an unenforceable contract when hiring an employee subject to a restrictive covenant like a non-compete. ” An unenforceable contract may be voidable by a counter-party to the contract without being void and, thus, may be the subject of interference.
Olartemoure Blog
NOVEMBER 11, 2022
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Colombia have their own laws and regulations to protect the privacy and personal data. The protection of personal data in Colombia is mainly regulated by: i) Law 1581 of 2012 and ii) the Regulatory Decree 1074 of 2015 in its chapter 25, among other rules that develop it. Sensitive Data v.
SpicyIP
JANUARY 2, 2022
Both suits were filed before the 2012 amendment to the Copyright Act. Further, given that the 2012 amendment does not have a retrospective effect, the Court held that the amendment has no effect on the legal position. The petitioner sought to exercise the right to privacy on behalf of her late aunt, J.
The IPKat
AUGUST 29, 2021
Upon that, The IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post co-authored by Anja Geller (PhD candidate at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) and Zihao Li (PhD candidate at CREATe, University of Glasgow, on privacy and data protection in the Chinese Civil Code).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content