Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

On September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”). Effective September 16, 2012, a third-party may submit prior art to the Patent Office. Among the changes created by the AIA, a new system was put into place for the submission of prior art to the Patent Office prior to patent issuance.

Art 40

Art Confidentiality Patent Application Patent 40

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 4, 2022

However, with the publication on 23 October 2012 of UAE Federal Law No. 4 of 2012 Concerning Regulation of Competition all businesses with operations in the UAE or supplying goods and services to the UAE market will have to ensure that they focus on and comply with the provisions of this new law. With the EUR1.47 Federal law no.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Law Business Design 52

Patently-O

JANUARY 10, 2023

Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint , 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 ( Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act , 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. ( Morgan.2011.AIAAmbiguities

Journalism 56

Journalism Trademark Patent Patent Law 56

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 9, 2022

These rights have the sole purpose and that it so protects and confer the creation or an invention specific to a certain period. Trademarks- as the patents protect the inventions, trademarks refer to the unique symbols and phrases used by an organization helping them to distinguish from the others in a competitive market.

Ownership 86

Ownership Copyright Trademark Contracts 86

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Court reasoned that when the Act was amended in 2012 – internet broadcasting was not alien to India and if the Legislature intended Section 31D to apply to internet broadcasting, it would’ve done so by specifically amending the provision. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. In Microsoft v.

IP 114

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 114

SpicyIP

JUNE 29, 2024

The core issue in these disputes is the alleged non-compliance with the stringent requirements of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, and the 2012 Biosimilar Guidelines. Despite these concerns, Biocon and Mylan prevailed in the legal proceedings. Keeping in mind this development, it seems like the case is far from being over.

Litigation 59

Litigation Confidentiality Marketing Marketing 59

SpicyIP

MARCH 7, 2024

The general aim of the expert evidence, either court appointed or bench appointed, is to ‘educate the court’ and ‘assist the judge’ which in the realm of IP could be questions such as ‘invalidity of an inventive step’, ‘insufficiency of an inventive step’ or infringement etc.

Patent Infringement 59

Patent Infringement Litigation IP Intellectual Property 59

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This decision indicates that an SEP owner sometimes might need to provide information to a prospective licensee (under a confidentiality agreement), although that may not be necessary for an experienced licensee who can consult existing patent licenses they have entered with others. non-discriminatory] part of FRAND).

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

The Report and Recommendation, adopted by the court, acknowledged that the parties were “legally justified” in redacting “sensitive and confidential pre-litigation material reflecting the parties’ substantive exchanges during the non-public pretrial exchanges” under the BPCIA, among other sensitive material. (17-cv-01407, 17-cv-01407, Dkt.

Litigation 52

Litigation Settlement Marketing Marketing 52