This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for false advertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. NatureWise’s products advertised that they met the same Dr. Oz-endorsed requirements. This was correct.
It reviews the growing importance of the protection of non-traditional trademarks within the fashion world in assessing how firms use trade dress to create and maintain an identity that may thrive within market competition. 6] Christian Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent (2012) US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [7]
3, 2025) Metrasens and plaintiff KDI compete in the market for ferromagnetic detectors, used to detect magnetic items (such as iron) on a persons body or clothing before the person enters a room containing an MRI scanner. KDIs witness testified that he could identify it as a 2012 prototype because of its color and serial number.
“Market entry for a pirate is easy. They openly advertise themselves through billboards and register for trademarks, as Magis TV recently did. “is lagging far behind” compared to other countries, partly because the initial SOPA site blocking proposal failed in 2012. ” “It is long overdue.
Some possible reasons why: The 2008 en banc ruling functionally became dicta in 2012 when the Ninth Circuit held that Roommates.com never touched illegal content at all. ” Finally, Facebook argued that its tools were “neutral” because they worked the same across all advertisers, not just housing advertisers. .”
Lanham Act claim: The recall was not “commercial advertising or promotion.” 2012), was not to the contrary. It then sent a “recall notice” to 110,000 convenience stores and truck stops, without specifying which “6 Hour Shot” was covered or mentioning that there were multiple such products on the market. 3d 723 (6th Cir.
I made my last New Year’s resolution 10 years ago in 2012. Well, when law enforcers come knocking and ask about your marketing practices, you can be pretty sure that they will also want to know what sort of training you do to make sure that your advertising and marketing are legally compliant.
2, 2023) A smoothly written opinion: As the complaint tells it, Paul Mitchell has long marketed its business and its products as “cruelty-free.” Although not all the purchased products appeared in the Chinese import registry, “in its marketing, Paul Mitchell doesn’t just advertise that it sells ‘cruelty-free’ goods.
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” Not all marketing of artistic works is noncommercial speech. The California Supreme Court reversed.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. Then, in Liapes v. Musk has bridged that gap. unless you are a Nazi or wannabe.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of false advertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. This was first used by VSL, marketed as VSL#3. De Simone created an eight-strain combination probiotic product known as the De Simone Formulation.
For example, another recent target – Mixdrop.co – loads with no issues and the same holds true for ThePirateBay.org, the BPI’s first ever blocking target a decade ago in 2012. It’s hard to draw firm conclusions but this tends to suggest that EE doesn’t view site blocking as an exciting marketing opportunity.
Police say that they uncovered a network, operating through various companies, that had been fraudulently commercializing video content since 2012. Police say that than 95 resellers represented the service in Spain, UK, Malta, Portugal, Cyprus, and Greece.
Hickma highlights some of the challenges that generics are facing when marketing drugs with these carved-out labels. The skinny label itself will not be enough to show inducement, but that evidence can be combined with other evidence (such as marketing) to prove liability. The Patents at Issue. The asserted patents, U.S. Patent Nos.
has offered design and marketing services under the name “Uber” since 1999. And Defendants began saying that they planned to expand into the display-advertising business: putting ads on a vehicle’s digital signage, a rider’s mobile app, and on digital screens like electronic billboards. Starting in 2012, Uber Inc. Uber Technol.,
A similar but broader effort failed in 2012 but twelve years is a very long time; in the tech and internet world, it’s almost forever. ” As stories go, it’s as compelling as a synopsis accompanying a good film on Netflix which promises and then delivers, exactly as advertised. Avatar: The Way of Water surging past $2.3
After the recent passage of Earth Day, companies released a number of advertisements promoting sustainable initiatives, earth-friendly products, and eco-conscious production methods. Greenwashing is “when a company purports to be environmentally conscious for marketing purposes but actually isn’t making any notable sustainability efforts.” [1]
Whole Foods Market Service, Inc., Whole Foods began purchasing small quantities of basil from them and selling the product in Whole Foods Market stores in the San Diego area in 2007. False advertising: Plaintiffs didn’t plausibly plead a false or misleading statement in a commercial advertisement or promotion.
Slogans are brief, memorable words that are commonly used in advertising to promote a specific company. Using a mark as an advertising slogan, on the other hand, does not prevent it from being registered as a trademark. Introduction. Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand.
Sen-Raleigh Cycle Factory, Asansol (West Bengal), first produced bicycle products in Siliguri, India, in the late 1920s and early 1930s, and they were marketed under the name “SEN-RALEIGH.” The plaint includes information on the registrations for the aforementioned mark, which are also registered trademarks in India.
A trademark refers to a name, mark, or sign through which the products belonging to a company or a person can be distinguished from other products in the market. Firstly, trademarks help distinguish one product from another in the market. Lastly, trademarks are pivotal for commercial purposes such as sales and advertisements.
With around 90% of the search market, Google is regularly criticized by rightsholders for allowing infringing content to appear in its search results. It has removed billions of reported infringing links and since 2012 has been downranking pirate sites, something that hit torrent portals particularly hard.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced earlier this month that it is seeking public comments on potential updates to its “Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims” (“Guides,” also known as “Green Guides”).
see this latest post) , penned a potent piece in 2012— examining the controversial past and uncertain future of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). Generally, the benchmark for comparative advertising hinges on the “average consumer” test. See e.g., here , here , and here. Check Mihir’s post for more.
Why Gen Z matters to brands Typically defined as people born between 1997 and 2012, Gen Z are seen by many brands as the number one audience to connect with online. For all brands and marketers, the purpose driven element is critical. Gen Z are incredibly important for the future of any brand. And for brands, its the same.
After the recent passage of Earth Day, companies released a number of advertisements promoting sustainable initiatives, earth-friendly products, and eco-conscious production methods. The FTC issued its first Green Guide in 1992, which it subsequently revised in 1996, 1998, and 2012. [2]
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. They weren’t directly asked about the phrase “Super Creatine,” whether participants had prior experiences with or opinions of Bang, or whether they had seen Vital’s advertising in the market.
The contested products were condiments marketed under names such as “Balsamico di.” Background of the case The Consortium found that two Italian Companies marketed bulk condiments labelled with names such as “Balsamico di” and “Ristretto di Balsamico”. 1151/2012 (recently replaced by EU Regulation No. 238 (Law no.
Unfortunately, much of what has been written about OA from the funder perspective looks at the journal market as comprised exclusively of two binary revenue inputs: APCs and institutional (academic) subscriptions. Corporations do not subscribe because they want to pay money; they subscribe because they rely on the content. Refining “Open”.
x] In fact, on the contrary, memes can operate as a source of marketing and a way to garner interest in creative works in a funny, generationally relevant way. xi] There are countless articles and marketing studies directing corporations on how to market via memes to reach the maximum level of engagement. 511, 523 (2012).
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, false advertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and false advertising. WGACA, LLC, 2022 WL 902931, No. 2253 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y.
Both suits were filed before the 2012 amendment to the Copyright Act. Further, given that the 2012 amendment does not have a retrospective effect, the Court held that the amendment has no effect on the legal position. However, later the defendant served a termination notice against which the plaintiff filed this suit.
Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for false advertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. Thus, the district court did not err by declining to instruct the jury on the safe harbor provision.
The defendant manufactured and sold high-priced model cars, in particular for collectors and advertising clients. If the lower court concludes again that Volkswagen had established genuine use, it will have to consider that the contested goods are not directed at the general public but, rather, at collectors and advertising clients.
On 24 August 2018, the Cancellation Division revoked the contested marks in respect of all of the goods in Class 9. Appeals were dismissed by the Fourth Board of Appeal (BoA) on the basis that evidence had to prove genuine use of the mark in the five years preceding the Cancellation Division’s decision (i.e.,
Havells, which introduced ‘REO’ in 2012 and holds a registered trademark, alleged that the defendants’ mark ‘CAB-RIO’ is deceptively similar and intended to ride on its goodwill. The appeal is set for final disposal on 21 April, 2025. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
Securities and Exchange Commission Allison Herren Lee observed that “climate risks and sustainability are critical issues for the investing public and our capital markets.” In February 2022, the National Advertising Division (NAD), oversaw two cases concerning environmental claims. sustainable). million in penalties.
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
There are many things one could reflect on, but this blog is about advertising and marketing law, so we’ll stick to that. It is more common than not for an advertiser to contest the track the challenger has selected, and we are already seeing more appeals and more referrals from these new tracks.
Financial intermediaries like banks and stock markets provided loans and facilitated share capital inflow and trading. However, start-ups often start with high costs and limited revenue, making it difficult for them to mobilize capital from traditional channels like the stock market or financial institutions. 100 Crores.
Havells, which introduced ‘REO’ in 2012 and holds a registered trademark, alleged that the defendants’ mark ‘CAB-RIO’ is deceptively similar and intended to ride on its goodwill. The appeal is set for final disposal on 21 April, 2025. and Cadila Healthcare Ltd.
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and false advertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh.
The services are advertised on the idea that customers can store the files for offline usage, and that is a unique selling point of the service, and it thus is not incidental. Although customers may have easy and legal access to music than before, how true is it in India? The uncertainty about the substantive provision remains. Conclusion.
Match.com used a 2012 TNS report to illustrate its goodwill and reputation and 70% of people surveyed would be able to recall Match.com if prompted, 44% unprompted and 31% of people would name Match.com as the first dating brand off the ‘top of their head.’. The lack of the suffix ‘.com’
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content