This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for falseadvertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. NatureWise’s products advertised that they met the same Dr. Oz-endorsed requirements. This was correct.
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. The California Supreme Court reversed.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. Defendant Pacifici “is a professor at Emory University who has been studying the clinical application of probiotics since at least 2012.”
2023) involves a set of thirteen different professional models whose images were allegedly used without their permission to advertise for the Capital Cabaret, a strip club halfway between Raleigh & Durham, North Carolina. 1125(a)(1) for misrepresentation of sponsorship (FalseAdvertising + False Association).
KDIs owner testified that the Ferralert Solo unit that Intertek tested was an early prototype from when the product was first released in 2012, and that KDI had made several improvements to the Ferralert Solo product since 2012. KDIs witness testified that he could identify it as a 2012 prototype because of its color and serial number.
On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for falseadvertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2012: [link]. The court issued a preliminary injunction and the duo agreed to no longer use Vogue’s marks in connection with the album. Metaverse and NFT Filings Decrease. 2020: [link]. 2019: [link].
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh.
But that meant that “it was Pictsweet’s own recall that communicated to its consumers false and disparaging information about Pictsweet’s products, not CRF’s recall. Lanham Act claim: The recall was not “commercial advertising or promotion.” 2012), was not to the contrary. Innovation Ventures, LLC v. 3d 723 (6th Cir.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. WGACA, LLC, 2022 WL 902931, No. 2253 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y.
In 2012, they allegedly signed a contract committing to purchase $573,000 in basil from plaintiffs per year, and then Whole Foods gave plaintiffs a “local producer loan” to buy greenhouse equipment, presenting them with an oversized check for $100,000 at the opening of a Whole Foods in Del Mar, California.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. They weren’t directly asked about the phrase “Super Creatine,” whether participants had prior experiences with or opinions of Bang, or whether they had seen Vital’s advertising in the market.
Read together and taken as true, these allegations plausibly suggest that Paul Mitchell tested some of its cosmetic products on animals and that its contrary “cruelty-free” advertising misled reasonable consumers. Maybe there’s another explanation, like nonenforcement, but that didn’t defeat plausibility.
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”
Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for falseadvertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. Thus, the district court did not err by declining to instruct the jury on the safe harbor provision.
Although members of the public are able to enter for chances to win prizes without paying money, Omaze advertises increased opportunities to win in exchange for larger donations.” Plaintiffs understandably also alleged that this was just an illegal lottery, and it sure has a lottery stench. Thus there was no misrepresentation-based claim.
Since 2012, Gema has been a part of the global Graco Group , an internationally leading manufacture of liquid conveyance systems and components. D667,080 , D567,015 , D670,356 , and D670,786 (collectively, the asserted patents) to Gema in 2012. Indianapolis, Indiana – The Plaintiff, Gema USA , Inc.
8, 2022) Plaintiffs claimed that Huggies Snug and Dry diapers were falselyadvertised as safe/not harsh for babies, but their son developed “severe and persistent rashes, lesions, blistering, and what appeared to be chemical burns on his skin” under the diaper. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 2:21-cv-01519-DAD-KJN, 2022 WL 16804522 (E.D.
Plaintiffs sued for falseadvertising and false endorsement under the Lanham Act, violation of their right to publicity, deceptive trade practices under New York GBL Section 349, and defamation. 2021), which considered all these claims except for falseadvertising. The court was guided by Electra v. 3d 233 (2d Cir.
23, 2022) Manufacturers lose an opportunity to create a circuit split on whether overpaying for a product that generally has a defect, which defect did not manifest for the class plaintiffs but plausibly reduced the value of the product, provides standing for a falseadvertising monetary relief claim.
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Green Guides , most recently updated in 2012, aim to ensure that environmental claims are truthful, substantiated, and not confusing to consumers. In February 2022, the National Advertising Division (NAD), oversaw two cases concerning environmental claims.
10] It concluded that a case under the Lanham Act is “exceptional” if the losing party was the plaintiff and was guilty of abuse of process in suing, or if the losing party was the defendant and had no defense yet persisted in the trademark infringement or falseadvertising for which it was being sued, in order to impose costs on its opponent. [11].
Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising. from Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law in 2012 and his B.S.
The Court reasoned that when the Act was amended in 2012 – internet broadcasting was not alien to India and if the Legislature intended Section 31D to apply to internet broadcasting, it would’ve done so by specifically amending the provision. Ltd and Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Music Broadcast Ltd. Makemytrip (India) Pvt.
Second, of course, confusing and explicitly misleading are two very different things—even “fraudulent” and explicitly misleading are two very different things, which is one reason that Lanham Act falseadvertising cases have developed workarounds to treat deliberately misleading ads the same way as explicitly false ads.
Although Kroger claimed that it was no longer using “ ‘Produced in the USA’ language in connection with any beef advertisements,” the court pointed out that it saw promotional stickers saying that in the store, and thus “understood” Kroger’s statement to mean only that the logos were no longer in mailings or other out-of-store ads.
The trial court found Ethicon committed 153,351 violations of the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and 121,844 violations of the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL) and imposed a $1,250 civil penalty for each violation. Materiality can also be relevant to whether class treatment is justified in a private FAL/UCL restitution action.
Static Controls in 2012, a Lanham Act falseadvertising case, the Court gave us two more principles for interpreting section 43: a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked.” Tam and Brunetti, striking down various bars on registration.
26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, falseadvertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. 3d 1266 (2012) (sports art), and Louis Vuitton Malletier S. Netflix, Inc., MCA Records, Inc.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content