This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The fashion industry sector extends beyond simple trademarks, such as logos or brand names, but rather includes characteristics, including colour palettes, product forms, or even the structure of physical store spaces. In an aesthetic-driven industry, these marks are very important for differentiating one brand from another.
With Gen Zs growing influence on global eCommerce, their attitudes toward counterfeiting present both a challenge and an opportunity for brands. In his previous role as Head of Digital IP Enforcement for Tommy Hilfiger , Alastair lead the global strategic operations for brand protection, encompassing both online and offline actions.
First posted March 27, 2012. The post at the link, by Corsearch, is, yeah, kind of an advertisement for Corsearch. The post Best of 2012: The way of all flash appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. So, what happens when a trademark registration lapses?
After being indicted along with the others in 2012, the Estonian was reported as living in the Netherlands. Julius Bencko, Graphic Designer In the United States government’s superseding indictment dated February 16, 2012, Julius Bencko is described as a citizen and resident of Slovakia.
The goal was to identify financial accounts, assets, advertising agencies, and the site’s hosting servers. The pair founded the site in 2012 but had left France and were living in Andorra when the authorities shut down their site. In the wake of the raid, it was claimed that Zone-Telechargement generated at least 1.5
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault false advertising laws. The California Supreme Court reversed.
Police say that they uncovered a network, operating through various companies, that had been fraudulently commercializing video content since 2012. The service worked under various brands including TV Choice Spain, Great TV Choice, and Best TV Choice.
Lastly, trademarks are pivotal for commercial purposes such as sales and advertisements. Moreover, trademarks also add to the brand value of a particular product or service. Thus, brands or companies that have a de facto monopoly in the market with respect to a particular product are likely to go through trademark genericide.
Besides Mariah, there were many other celebrity trademark stories this year, as more an more celebrities launch more and more brands. On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2012: [link]. The firm has registered more than 4,000 U.S.
In Europe, it owns and runs a variety of bike and cycling brands, including “RALEIGH.” ” According to the corporation, bicycles, cycles, and bikes with the aforementioned brand were imported into India for the first time in 1910, per news reports. ” The defendants Imperial Cycle Mfg. .”
The basic setup involves a drug that has several different approved uses; with the branded manufacturer holding patents covering only some of the uses. Although the generic typically makes a profit on these sales, it those profits pale in comparison to the profits lost by the branded company. June 25, 2024). 355(j)(2)(A)(viii).
With Gen Z ambivalent on the cost of counterfeiting to legitimate brands – and often actively seeking fakes out – how can brands educate consumers about their societal harms? Typically defined as people born between 1997 and 2012, Gen Z are seen by many brands as the number one audience to connect with online.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, false advertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and false advertising. Chanel has an internal inventory system and voids such stolen or missing serial numbers.
And Defendants began saying that they planned to expand into the display-advertising business: putting ads on a vehicle’s digital signage, a rider’s mobile app, and on digital screens like electronic billboards. Starting in 2012, Uber Inc. But in 2019, Uber Technology allegedly began preparatory steps to enter the advertising business.
It first registered a word mark ‘MATCH.COM’ in 1996 and also owns other dating-related brands including Tinder and Hinge with other marks including the word mark ‘TINDER’. This was due to the reputation of Match.com’s trade marks and because a consumer would believe that Muzmatch was a sub-brand of Match.com. The lack of the suffix ‘.com’
Subodh Chachra Proprietor Of M/S Expose vs V2 Promoters Pvt Ltd on 3 March, 2025 (Delhi District Court) the plaintiff, owner of the trademark “X’POSE” for apparel, sued the defendant for infringing and passing off its brand name in the hospitality sector through “XPOSE LOUNGE.”
Slogans are brief, memorable words that are commonly used in advertising to promote a specific company. Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand. Using a mark as an advertising slogan, on the other hand, does not prevent it from being registered as a trademark.
The average consumer would conclude that the portion ‘Match’ is the badge of origin for Match.com due to its reputation as a brand and the very substantial degree of distinctiveness in the dating industry. ’ Muzmatch is a comparatively niche but growing dating platform, which aims to provide a halal (i.e.
[The] evidence indicates that there was bona fide domestic use of the CS mark on amplifiers in the ordinary course of trade from 2012 through 2015. In the 2012-2015 period, Respondent’s domestic sales, measured in dollar amounts, were in the five-to-six figure range annually. emphasis by the Board).
There are too many revenue sources to consider in one article, such as member subscriptions, advertising, photocopying, and individual article sales. In other cases, revenue, plus brand protection and quality control block flipping. In some cases, such as academic photocopying, the revenues are modest and unlikely to impede a flip.
Brands have recently begun to co-opt this form of communication in an attempt to capitalize on the prevalence and effectiveness of memes. [ii] 511, 523 (2012). xi] See Diana Bradley, 5 Brands Insert Themselves into the Viral ‘Distracted Boyfriend’ Stock Picture , PRWEEK (Aug. vii] Deidrè A. viii] See, e.g., Lee J.
Do a quick Google search and you will find many sites explaining the history and significance of the phrase to Apple and its branding, and how it brought a new wave of popularity and interest to a floundering Apple company as of 1997.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. They weren’t directly asked about the phrase “Super Creatine,” whether participants had prior experiences with or opinions of Bang, or whether they had seen Vital’s advertising in the market. Monster Energy Co.
These condiments were then decanted, at the time of purchase, into glass bottles labelled by hand with the product name and the brand “Teatro del Gusto - sinfonia di sapori”. 1151/2012 (recently replaced by EU Regulation No. 1151/2012 (recently replaced by EU Regulation No. 2024/1143 of 11 April 2024).
Industria, based on Colombia, produces and distributes food products under two relevant brand names: Zenú and Ranchera. They’re successful brands: approximately $300,000,000 annually in sales of Zenú products and $100,000,000 in sales of Ranchera products. For the first two, Industria failed to show literal falsity.
And, for the most part, the content of the generic label is derived directly from the brand-patentee’s label. Once a brand drug is no longer patented, the fact that some of the drug’s uses remain patented “will not foreclose marketing a generic drug for other unpatented [uses].” Caraco (2012). Teva Pharms. 22-37 (2022).
Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for false advertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. When Premier considered running its own study, its president wrote: “if poor—don’t publish.”
an Italian Group best known for its fashion brand ICEBERG. ICE" EUTM Facts On 6 June 2012, GILMAR S.P.A. On this very topic, this Kat has found a recent decision issued by the Board of Appeal (BOA) concerning the EUTM “ICE” belonging to Gilmar S.P.A. ,
This came out as a real surprise to the public, as most of them were unaware that “Velcro” was in fact the name of their brand and not that of the product that they were dealing with. In 2012 while deciding B.V Major multinationals such as Google Inc., Xerox Holdings Corporation, Adobe Inc. Ilango Himachalapathy v.
.” That same environmental information—encompassing the “E” in trending ESG—is of value to consumers who seek out and, at times, pay a premium for “green” branded products. In February 2022, the National Advertising Division (NAD), oversaw two cases concerning environmental claims.
Rapala: Happy Fishing on Mother’s Day (2012). Rapala’s “More Hits Than Google” Billboard Update (Photo Included) (2009). Good Bye Google, Hello Whudjagiddumon? Rapala Taunts a Monster? Rapala Billboard Ads Continue to Engage (2013). Eat More Walleye? Top Ten Questions About Rapala Minnocchio (2015).
In 2012, when Borbay first established the guide, he had been working full-time as an artist for three years. Borbay stresses the fact that he didn’t become a full-time artist until he was 28 years old and had already worked a handful of full-time jobs in business development, advertising, and licensing. And perhaps it is.
But a prominent bar to such registration shall appear when the colour would be used in relation to a product denoting the quality or function of the product [28] —for example, registration of the colour ‘red’ for a brand of apple juice. 2012] EWHC 2637 (Ch) (1 October 2012). [34] Anubaker CS (COMM) No.890/2018
Plaintiffs sued for false advertising and false endorsement under the Lanham Act, violation of their right to publicity, deceptive trade practices under New York GBL Section 349, and defamation. 2021), which considered all these claims except for false advertising. The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
Given that finding and clearing a new brand purely from a legal perspective can take months, it is interesting to note that when a Defendant loses an infringement case it will almost certainly be ordered to rebrand within days, weeks at the most. The parties were back in court in January for a form of order hearing.
Intellectual Property such as patents, trademarks, brand value, copyright, etc have become foundational assets for several businesses, seeking greater importance and attention. This was done during 2012-2015 when it faced bankruptcy. In 2012, Alcatel, a telecommunications equipment company as acquired for 16.6 bn USD by Nokia.
Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. from Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law in 2012 and his B.S.
In this article, we serve you up all the juicy details of the Full Court of the Federal Court decision on the appeal and cross-claim , and consider what the latest development in this case means for businesses feeling “inspired” by another company’s branding, trade marks and reputation. Lettuce recap. the In-N-Out Marks ). passing off.
One of these brands that has popped up on the AmeriKat's Instagram are riding boots from Fairfox & Favor. It sells well-known and artisan brands through its retail premises, online store and mail-order catalogue and has an annual turnover of £30million. The footwear part of their business accounted for less than 20%.
If the property of a person can be protected, likewise, when a popular celebrity like Amitabh Bachchan faces possible harm regarding his brand, the same can be protected under his right to publicity. If that usage does not direct to any particular famous person then it would not lead to infringement of publicity rights.
on 14 February, 2025 (Delhi HC) TThe plaintiff, a manufacturer of Ayurvedic and Unani medicines, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark and copyright infringement of its well-known ‘KUKA’ brand. Herbal Bioactives Llp & Ors. The appeal is set for final disposal on 21 April, 2025.
on 14 February, 2025 (Delhi HC) TThe plaintiff, a manufacturer of Ayurvedic and Unani medicines, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark and copyright infringement of its well-known ‘KUKA’ brand. Herbal Bioactives Llp & Ors. The appeal is set for final disposal on 21 April, 2025.
Consumer rights abuses, deceptive advertising, and unfair commercial practices are examples. The complaint claims that artificial intelligence-created deepfakes of Anil Kapoor and his name-branded websites defraud customers. Rights are crucial in today’s competitive world of celebrities competing for fame and advertising.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content