article thumbnail

Who appeals (and wins) patent cases?

Patently-O

This prompted the question for me: who actually files appeals in patent infringement cases and how representative are they of the underlying civil actions filed in the courts? It turns out that the answer is “mostly patent asserters” and that they aren’t necessarily representative of case filings.

Patent 137
article thumbnail

Lenovo Touts UK Wins Against Ericsson in Wireless Device, FRAND Licensing Disputes

IP Watchdog

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ruling on the scope of a 2011 wireless device licensing agreement between Motorola (a Lenovo company) and Ericsson. Yesterday, the UKs High Court of Justice of England and Wales (EWHC) issued an approved judgment in Motorola Mobility, LLC v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Sham Litigation Exception after AbbVie - Is the Subjective Element a Sham?

JD Supra Law

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sued AbbVie and Besins Healthcare, co-owners of a patent that covered brand AndroGel, in 2017. The FTC claimed that the manufacturers had brought “sham” patent infringement litigation in 2011 against Teva and another generic supplier, Perrigo.

article thumbnail

Do trade secrets matter? It is not at all clear if you ask the stock market

The IPKat

Event studies have been used before in IP, in particular regarding patent infringement disputes and patent oppositions. Generally, the very instance of an infringement case conveys positive returns for the patent owner and negative returns for the alleged infringer, irrespective of the outcome.

Marketing 142
article thumbnail

AI Developing Software Companies Litigate Over Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

(DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. Since launching their website in 2011, Disintermediation has handled over one million chat messages. Patent infringement cases can be complex, and the outcome can have significant implications for both the patent owner and the accused party.

article thumbnail

Manhattan Jury Orders Nintendo to Pay $30 Million for Patent Infringement

Greenspoon Marder LLP

million in damages to Tomita Technologies for patent infringement. After leaving the company, he applied for the patent in issue in March of 2003, and the patent was issued in 2008 licensed to Tomita Technologies. By: Sharon Urias, Esq. A Manhattan jury earlier this month ordered Nintendo to pay $30.2 In 2012, U.S.

article thumbnail

Airing their Dirty Diapers: Final decision in Angelcare v Munchkin

IPilogue

On April 07, 2022, the Federal Court of Canada released its judgment in favour of the plaintiffs in the patent infringement action against Munchkin Inc. the “defendants’ or “Munchkin”) for direct and induced patent infringement. A salient feature of this judgment is the decision on indirect infringement or inducement.