article thumbnail

Who appeals (and wins) patent cases?

Patently-O

This prompted the question for me: who actually files appeals in patent infringement cases and how representative are they of the underlying civil actions filed in the courts? It turns out that the answer is “mostly patent asserters” and that they aren’t necessarily representative of case filings. 235 (2018) ).

Patent 137
article thumbnail

Lenovo Touts UK Wins Against Ericsson in Wireless Device, FRAND Licensing Disputes

IP Watchdog

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ruling on the scope of a 2011 wireless device licensing agreement between Motorola (a Lenovo company) and Ericsson. Yesterday, the UKs High Court of Justice of England and Wales (EWHC) issued an approved judgment in Motorola Mobility, LLC v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Defending Design Patents

Patently-O

In our new paper, The Truth About Design Patents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. design patents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of design patents: Half of all design patent applications are rejected. Most asserted design patents are invalidated in litigation.

article thumbnail

Best of 2011: Sun, Oracle, Microsoft, Google, trademark, patents, copyright and David Boies

Likelihood of Confusion

First posted September 28, 2011. ” in VentureBeat: Ten years ago, The post Best of 2011: Sun, Oracle, Microsoft, Google, trademark, patents, copyright and David Boies appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.

article thumbnail

Ulm University v. Asst. Controller of Patents and Designs: Madras High Court quashes unreasoned order of Patent Office

SpicyIP

Controller of Patents and Designs , came down heavily on the IPO for its shoddy order rejecting the patent application filed by the appellant. The judgment raises serious concerns regarding the quality of functioning of the patent office. Order The Patent Controller issued a cryptic order rejecting the patent application.

Design 103
article thumbnail

Another day, Another Unreasoned Order by the Indian Patent Office: Analyzing Signal Pharmaceuticals vs Deputy Controller of Patents

SpicyIP

In Signal Pharmaceuticals vs Deputy Controller of Patents , the Madras High Court set aside the impugned order by the Indian Patent Office for being a non-speaking one. Consequently, the Court referred the matter back to the Indian Patent Office for fresh consideration. His previous posts can be accessed here.

Patent 59
article thumbnail

Current Patent Litigation Trends

JD Supra Law

According to Docket Navigator, 2022 was the first year since 2019 that the annual number of new patent cases fell below 5,300. Before 2019, the annual number of new cases had not been below 4,300 since 2011. By: BakerHostetler