IIPRD
JANUARY 22, 2025
One such legal issues is what is referred to as “fair use,” which becomes particularly problematic in the context of the copyright law. Thus, fundamental questions arise, such as whether such copying amounts to infringement under copyright law or whether it falls under the purview of fair use. Google, Inc.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
Such uses, they argue, constitute copyright infringement. Fair Use Precedent? Google Books and Transformative Use The past two decades have seen a wealth of technological developments, but generative AI is qualitatively different from everything that has come before. However, the U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JUNE 30, 2021
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (‘District Court’) held that the defendants’ use of the song was fair use and granted the motion to dismiss the claims. On appeal, on 18 May 2021 the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (‘Second Circuit’) upheld the District Court’s decision.
Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
” The case raises questions of fair use and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works. As for the case itself, it was settled in 2011 with neither side surrendering their position. He was ultimately fined and sentenced to two years probation for it.
IPilogue
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
In 2011, to enforce the decision in the States, De Fontbrune brought the case to California who ruled in Wofsy’s favour in 2019. The plaintiffs argued that the book has a commercial purpose, which weighs against fair use. Nevertheless, the fair use defence remains a gamble for artists and creatives.
TorrentFreak
AUGUST 19, 2021
The Internet Archive (IA) sees things differently, noting that its ‘Controlled Digital Lending’ process operates for purposes including preservation, access and research, therefore meeting ‘fair use’ standards. In parallel, IA believes its liability is limited due to the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA.
IP and Legal Filings
MARCH 19, 2025
Furthermore, A legal notice had been issued to Nayanthara by Dhanush prior to the usage of the clip, stating the consequence of using the BTS would be a ten-crore lawsuit, which Nayanthara openly neglected by incorporating the said footage in the trailer of the documentary. ” This did not amount to infringement as it was inspired work.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content