This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In our new paper, The Truth About Design Patents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. design patents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of design patents: Half of all design patent applications are rejected. Most asserted design patents are invalidated in litigation.
The Finished Article: Essays on Indian Designs Law. I am delighted to take this opportunity to share with the SpicyIP community the release of my book, The Finished Article: Essays on Indian Designs Law (Thomson Reuters, 2022, ISBN-13: 978-9393702173). Eashan writes about Indian intellectual property law on his Medium page.
The lawsuit was filed by Unicolors, which accused H&M of infringing a 2011design that they created as part of a 2015 one H&M sold in their stores and online. 2: Ruling Opens the Door to Protecting Room Design Under the Copyright Act. The case was brought by LDC Hotels & Resorts against Sheraton Taitung Hotel.
Controller of Patents and Designs , came down heavily on the IPO for its shoddy order rejecting the patent application filed by the appellant. 645/CHENP/2011 filed on 31.01.2011) concerning use of Opioids or Opioid Mimetics for the Treatment of Resistant Cancer Patients. .” The above patent application was filed in 2011.
Also, many have design errors due to their age. Copyright Challenges in Creating Garbage Horror : Back in October 2011, my partner and I were running a small YouTube channel named Garbage Horror, where we reviewed various low-budget horror movies. I’m working to fix those, but it will take time.
BD Bhandari (2011) [3] , the Delhi High Court stated that a guidebook compiled using copyrighted material served a purpose of transformation, independent from the expressive intent of the original work. BD Bhandari, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 3216. According to University of Cambridge v. Google, Inc., 3d 202 (2d Cir. Goldsmith, 598 U.S.
In February, 2011 I wrote about Trademark™, a design studio with the domain name www.trademark-trademark.com. I was looking to refer back to that post because I wanted to link to it, as. The post Trademark, trademark, trademark! appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
In 2009, the Associated Press filed a lawsuit against artist Shepherd Fairey over the famous Obama “Hope” poster that he designed. As for the case itself, it was settled in 2011 with neither side surrendering their position. To that end, there are three particularly interesting cases to look at.
Smartish claims that Scooch has been selling mobile phone cases that closely resemble Smartishs distinctive designs, particularly those from its popular “ Wallet Slayer ” series. According to the Complaint, Smartish, based in Austin, Texas , has been designing and selling mobile phone cases since 2011.
On January 11, 2022, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) released a report entitled Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases: Canadian Trends and International Comparisons, 2011-2020 as part of the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System (NPDUIS) initiative.
On August 30, the office of the Controller General of Patents, Design and Trademarks (CGPDTM) released a public notice inviting comments from stakeholders to revamp the different IP guidelines and manuals. The invitation is specific to the Patents, Designs, Trademarks, GI and Copyright Manuals and Guidelines.
In many cases, manufacturing IP may be easy for any potential competitor, generic or biosimilar company to design around. It is challenging for generics and biosimilars to design around a drug substance patent, given that regulatory approvals are tied to the drug substance itself.
Manufacturing Week is designed to coincide with Manufacturing Day, which has been held the first Friday in October since 2011. Manufacturing Week expands upon the traditional Manufacturing Day launched by the Manufacturing Institute in 2011. It’s no secret the manufacturing sector has a major impact on the U.S.
In 2020, Storus (AKA “Mosaic Brands”) sued Ridge Wallet for both patent infringement (US7334616) and product-design trade dress misappropriation. Summary Judgment : Mosaic lacked product design trade dress rights. Mosaic also corroborated that testimony with invoices showing the SMCII was sold at a trade show in 2011.
In 2005, Marcel and its licensee misappropriated Lucky Brand’s trademarks by replicating its designs and emblems in a new apparel line, according to the lawsuit filed by the Petitioner. Hence, the claim preclusion didn’t and couldn’t prevent the Petitioner from defending the 2011 Suit using its settlement agreement defense.
Over the last 20 years, the total number of design patents issued per year in the United States has erupted. As illustrated in the graph below and further highlighted in this animated graph, in the 30 year period between the years 1971 and 2000 a total of nearly 219,000 design patents were issued by the U.S.
The Second Circuit recently reversed an injunction stripping designer and Instagram influencer Hayley Paige Gutman of her Instagram accounts in a dispute with her former business partners. Gutman is a wedding dress designer and used the Instagram account @misshayleypaige to promote her designs and as a personal account.
Bill C-11, the online streaming law that is now before the CRTC, was never really designed to address Bell’s broadcasting concerns. In fact, in 2011 I wrote about how this was likely to become a major issue for Canadian broadcasters dependent on licensing U.S. This was back in 2011. programming.
Unicolors is the owner of copyrights in various fabric designs, including a 2011 copyright registration that consisted of 31 separate designs. it registered it as a single publication when some of the designs were apparently not put on sale to the public all at once), the registration should have been found to be invalid.
Monster alleged a likelihood of confusion between its registered "Claw" design mark for various goods and services, and applicant's "Circled MV" design mark for goods and services in eight classes. Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher , 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011). The standard is the same. See Nike, Inc. Text Copyright John L.
A Second Circuit panel on Friday vacated $2 million in damages awarded to a sailboat designer in a decade-long trademark battle, finding that a Connecticut federal court erred in its conclusion that a rival boat maker should have known as early as 2011 that it could not use the disputed mark.
Started in 2011, the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll is an initiative of D.C. Designates high honors. Fish & Richardson is proud to announce that 26 attorneys from its Washington, D.C., office have been named to the 2021 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll. courts in partnership with the D.C. Access to Justice Commission and the D.C.
A new federal bill aims to put golf courses on “par” with other architectural designs by expanding federal copyright protection to golf courses. This broad definition covers everything from literature to music to photographs, and — since a 1990 amendment to the Copyright Act — the design of buildings.
The Controller of Patents & Designs ( pdf ). 2022) ( pdf ), the Delhi High Court noted how the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs dismissed the Petitioners pre-grant opposition and granted the patent to the Respondent without considering the contention under Section 3(d) at all. Deputy Controller of Patents & Anr.
” Rather, the design of the system is to create an open incentive field to generally encourage innovation, disclosure, and commercialization. The argument begins with an analysis of the Patent Act: (1) nothing in the Act actually requires human inventors; and (2) nothing in the Act requires “conception.”
These appear to be the first—and certainly the first precedential—Federal Circuit cases dealing with the merits of one of the numerous “Schedule A” design patent cases that have been filed in recent years in the NDIL. It is clear, from reading the decision, that the design patent infringement claims lacked merit.
It all started in 2011 when the US Navy began testing Bitmanagement’s 3D virtual reality application ‘BS Contact Geo’ After some testing, the Navy installed the software across its network, assuming that it had permission to do so. Software Company Sues US Navy. ” 579 ‘Infringing’ Copies.
In the years following its initial release in 2011, Minecraft captured a truly massive audience. EaglerCraft also infringes Mojang’s Minecraft copyrights by using Minecraft character designs and artwork to advertise these services.”
However, a study of Electronic Thesis Dissertations deposited between 2011-2015 at Concordia University, determined that nearly a quarter of hypertext links cited exhibited linkrot. For example, programs like WebCite provided an on-demand archive site, designed to digitally preserve scientific and educationally important materials.
He kept readers informed about the latest developments in trade marks, designs, AI, and copyright law. Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot joined the IPKat as an InternKat at the start of 2023 and then continued as a GuestKat. We appreciate all your work over the last two years and we wish you good luck with your future endeavours, Kevin!
Comment The first thing to note is that this application was lodged in 2011. First, because it reiterates once again that how a system of exceptions and limitations is designed does indeed matter. As a result, “The respondent State [.] failed to discharge its positive obligation under Article 1 of Protocol No.
It was back in January 2011 when Future Enterprises had officially filed ‘Mac Coffee and Eagle device’ trademark before DOI. However, McDonald’s can still appeal in higher court against the recent decision, which, McDonald’s previously in 2011 did not file any appeal in higher court. Conclusion.
Unicolors’s business model is to create artwork, copyright it, print the artwork on fabric, and market the designed fabrics to garment manufacturers.” A Google search turns up three different pairs of designs with differing degrees of similarity. b)(4)(i)(A) (2011). Factual and Procedural Background. 3d 1194 , 1196 (9th Cir.
Mattel countersued, arguing that Carter Bryant , the designer of Bratz and a former employee of Mattel, had created the dolls while working for Mattel under a contract that stated all his designs were the property of Mattel, thereby making the Bratz design Mattel’s intellectual property.
” These two provisions were amended and removed respectively as part of the America Invents Act of 2011. 235, 290 (1991); Carroll Pursell, The Cover Design: Women Inventors in America, 22 TECH. & 881 (2011). ” Still, other provisions in the law were not changed during this makeover and remain male gendered.
As part of its defense, Redbubble presented evidence that Atari had only complained to Redbubble once (in 2011) before bringing suit in 2018, and that when the lawsuit was filed, Redbubble took quick action to remove potentially infringing designs from its site. The jury in this case decided. By: Morgan Lewis
One oddity of this conclusion is that definition was added in 2011 as part of the America Invents Act, and without any suggestion on record that the amendment was intended to exclude robots or non-humans. Thaler’s new petition asks the U.S.
As I’ve explained many times over, Section 230 by design applies when defendants exercise editorial discretion over third-party material; the whole point is to encourage entities to do more content moderation. First, Section 230 isn’t limited to defendants who act as a “passive conduit” for third-party content.
Founded in 2011, AnonFiles.com became known as a popular hosting service that allowed users to share files up to 20GB without download restrictions. Both sites launched around the same time and shared a similar design and identical features.
Kreglinger's first vintage of the wine promoted and sold as "New Certan" was the 2011 vintage, released in 2013. The label designer had received photos of VCC bottles and instruction from de Moor to use them as inspiration. For the earliest vintages, the label depicted the de Moor family home on their vineyard in Tasmania.
2011 priority filing date). This on/off function is designed to both save power on the device and also help prevent hacking. This is another case that serves as a data-point, but I struggle to differentiate it from similar cases finding claims ineligible. CosmoKey’s U.S.
Kimberly-Clark Corp (2011) is the most recently published intellectual property case on toilet paper. In conclusion, the Court held that functionality cannot be trademarked and that the diamond design on toilet paper actually performs a function—something to consider the next time you run out. References. Kimberly-Clark Corp. ,
The BPI says this is the first time since website blocking began in 2011 that a mobile operator has begun blocking pirate sites. Those ISPs include EE, a broadband provider that’s also the operator of the UK’s largest mobile network. So, during the past few hours, we had some tests carried out on EE’s network in the UK.
Case Summaries Guddu Gupta Trading as Ms Leela vs Suraj Gupta Trading As Ms Devi Leela … on 18 January, 2025 (Delhi District Court) The plaintiff, trading as Leela Cosmetics, alleged that his brother operating under Devi Leela Cosmetics, infringed upon his trademarks ROOP LADY and ROOP LEELA, as well as the design of his sindoor stick bottles.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content