IPilogue

JANUARY 14, 2022

Our hard-working students and community members published more than twice as many articles than in 2020 and the most articles in a calendar year since 2011. Is GitHub’s New Feature a Copyright Infringer? Copyright Confusion: Sony Upsetting Nintendo YouTubers by Natalie Bravo. Copyright Law. David Vaver.

IP 105

IP Copyright Infringement Inventor Intellectual Property 105

SpicyIP

MAY 23, 2022

On the 20th of May, the Supreme Court, in M/s Knit Pro International vs The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr , held that offences under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 are cognizable and non-bailable offences. The Delhi High Court, in the context of Section 64, in Event and Event Management Association v. Decriminalisation.

Copyright 137

Copyright Ownership Copyright Infringement Law 137

CopyrightsWorld

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

This article is part of our series showcasing well-known copyright ownership cases from the music and film industries, technology, and more. This week’s post looks at three well-known copyright infringement cases involving tech giants battling each other over ownership rights. Apple vs. Microsoft.

Intellectual Property 76

Intellectual Property Design Patent Design Designs 76

43(B)log

DECEMBER 26, 2022

Copyright infringement: Infringement requires unauthorized exercise of an §106 right, including the exclusive right to “distribute copies” of the copyrighted work “by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.” Contributory copyright infringement: In Luvdarts, LLC v.

Copyright Infringement 59

Copyright Infringement Branding Branding Brands 59

SpicyIP

AUGUST 26, 2024

However, its specific emphasis on protecting certain elements of the whole scheme of copyrighted content, such as fictional characters and the distinctive personas they embody, has been a focal point, contributing substantially to the discourse surrounding the ever-expanding ambit of copyrightability as well as personality rights.

Personality Rights 111

Personality Rights Privacy Copyright Trademark 111

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 21, 2023

In other words, it gives the copyright owner the exclusive right to make copies of the work, and to exercise the ancillary rights that come with that monopolistic power, such as licensing rights, et cetera. However, that is sometimes not enough to avoid infringement, which is where registration comes in. In the case of Whitmill v.

Artistic Work 52

Artistic Work Ownership Copyright Infringement Copyright 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 21, 2023

They are as follows: Literary Works Artistic Works Dramatic Works Cinematographic Films Musical Works Sound Recordings The copyright law decrees that copyright protection exists from the moment a creative work is finished. However, that is sometimes not enough to avoid infringement, which is where registration comes in.

Copyright 52

Copyright Artistic Work Copyright Infringement Ownership 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

But last year, one supranational interference with copyright law surprisingly did not come from Luxemburg, but from Strasbourg: the judgment in Safarov v Azerbaijan. He sues for copyright infringement and claims damages. The Azerbaijani Supreme Court upholds this decision in 2011.

Copyright 92

Copyright Copying Copyright Law Publishing 92

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 11, 2022

2011) the “arbitrability of IPR disputes” was the subject of a notable ruling by the Hon. 2011 in relation to the personam problem arising out of rights in rem. The arrangement between Eros and Telemax was for the licencing of Telemax’s copyrighted Eros content. Arbitration in Intellectual Property.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Settlement IP Copyright 52

43(B)log

JULY 3, 2023

27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. I don’t quite get how it could show ownership of the trade dress in the US but not ownership of the word marks.) Latinfood U.S.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Registration 59

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

Copyright laws, for instance, vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. What constitutes copyright infringement in one country may not be in another. 1] , t he cloud service provider was not made liable even after abetting the infringement. Thus, in Tiffany(NJ) Inc. eBay Inc. [1] link] (Accessed: 29 October 2023). [8]

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property IP Government Technology 52

TorrentFreak

JULY 23, 2023

That includes copyright infringement. Primarily, we stress that our service is not intended to be used for illegal activities and copyright infringements and we request our users to comply with this when accepting our Terms of Use. If we receive any type of DMCA requests or Copyright Infringement Notices – we ignore them.

Privacy 140

Privacy IP Technology Reporting 140

Intepat

JANUARY 17, 2025

These publishers have filed numerous lawsuits alleging copyright infringement, aiming to shut down the platform. Sci-Hub was founded in 2011 by Elbakyan, a graduate student from Kazakhstan, Sci-Hubs mission is to democratize access to knowledge. Thus, the contract is void.

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Infringement Copyright Law Publishing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Based solely on the complaint that was filed, there are six major issues raised by the case: First, were the recorded interviews a copyright-eligible “work of authorship”? Second, if so, who is the initial owner of the copyright(s)? Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. 1332 ].

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 8, 2025

Vels on copyright ownership over the song En Iniya Pon Nilave, Tanishka Goswami writes on the implication of the decision on the composers. She graduated from National Law University, Delhi in 2023 & enjoys reading and writing on copyright laws. Explaining the recent Delhi High Court order in Saregama v.

Copyright 103

Copyright Music Ownership Licensing 103