This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ali Shayif (2009) ( paywalled ) which has been cited numerous times by the Supreme Court and numerous High Courts of India ( here and here ). It has been noted that to justify piercing the corporate veil, there must be both- control of the company by the wrongdoer and an impropriety , a principle from a UK judgment Ben Hashem v.
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Seun Lari-Williams , PhD researcher in the fields of copyright and dispute system design at the University of Antwerp, regarding copyright ownership of Nigeria’s re-adopted national anthem. Is the national anthem in the public domain?
2009), the Board concluded in the IPRs that the operating manuals were not sufficiently publicly accessible to qualify as printed publications under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § The court added that Weber’s copyright ownership of the operating manuals does not negate Weber’s ability to make the operating manuals publicly accessible. Patent Nos.
The Walt Disney Company saw the potential and purchased Marvel in 2009. In 2015, Marvel and Sony made an unprecedented deal that the two companies would share joint-ownership in Spider-Man’s copyright. The film received praise from critics. The American Film Institution selected it as one of the best films of 2008.
In 2009 , users woke up to find their purchased copy of 1984 had disappeared from their library. This was possible through the unique licensing arrangement of Kindle and would not be possible in the case of ownership.
Applicant pointed out that the marks have co-existed since 2009 without actual confusion. Under the 13th DuPont factor, Applicant pointed to its ownership of six registrations for MAGIC CITY marks, invoking the Strategic Partners precedent. The Board, however, noted the lack of evidence of the extent of use of the cited mark.
It was not until 2009 that the IGC received a mandate for text-based negotiations. The early years focused on investigating and analysing national experiences to understand the relationship between IP and genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions.
Abhinandan, on the other hand, transferred his ownership to the real estate group in return for Rs. 35 does not apply if the name has acquired distinctive or secondary meaning (The Goenka case (2009)). 500 crores (disputed figure). Abhinandan was also given two businesses- Lodha Ventures and Lodha FinServ. Further, Sec.
In the age of cryptocurrency, the first move was advanced by the introduction of Bitcoin, which was introduced in a white paper in 2008, and then it came to be launched in 2009. The ramifications of not attributing trademark ownership could lead to multiple issues arising from the unsound use of such technology. Concluding Remarks.
The first Declaration (Prakas) on the Procedures for Registration and Protection of Geographical Indications, dated May 18, 2009, served as the basis for the registration of Kampot Pepper and Kampong Speu Palm Sugar. Geographical indications in Cambodia are based on three legal instruments.
In Moreno , the Board held that, although exclusive licensee Julie Moreno could establish entitlement to a statutory cause of action, she could not prove priority based on use of the mark at issue by her licensor because that would "improperly recognize trademark ownership rights in a licensee." See also Chem. Conmar Form Sys.,
The court has swiftly addressed the potential for disagreement over this ownership by allowing the affected party to seek clarification through a formal application. iii] L’Oreal v eBay [2009] EWHC 1094 [iv] Disney Enterprises, Inc. link] [i] DataReportal – Global Digital Insights (n.d.). DIGITAL AROUND THE WORLD. Datareportal.com.
There is some debate over the effectiveness of these capital controls because, according to some analysts, capital flight increased significantly between 2009 and 2018. The 2017 prohibition did not go as far as to outlaw cryptocurrency ownership or mining, which the 2021 ban ultimately does).
As such, breeders can obtain patents, trademarks, and industrial designs that establish their ownership over legally approved new plant varieties. The 2009 law enacted for regulation of plant varieties in the country ensured that there is requisite protection provided to the breeders through a sui generis system.
The legal framework covers a large number of regulations on the media including ownership, prohibitions on certain kinds of defamation. In 2009, there was a draft revision to the media law which was circulated. The primary source of law with respect to the media sector in the UAE is Federal No. In 2006, the Cabinet Resolution No.
2009), the Board concluded in the IPRs that the operating manuals were not sufficiently publicly accessible to qualify as printed publications under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § The court added that Weber’s copyright ownership of the operating manuals does not negate Weber’s ability to make the operating manuals publicly accessible.
trademark office records reveals that Viacom obtained rights in a broad array of TMNT marks after a highly-publicized purchase from the Mirage Group in 2009. Here’s the first clause, section (i), dealing with ownership of the Bored Ape NFTs: “i. And a quick review of U.S. You Own the NFT. ” Sounds pretty good, right?
Union of India, the question of validity of an assignment deed executed in 2009 and effective in 2005 was brought before the court. When an assignment deed is executed on 6th January, 2009, it would have to take effect from the said date and not from an earlier date.
This process of subinfeudation from on high—the giving of land to thekedars (contractors) who subsequently acquired zamindari (land ownership rights)—alters the existence of a tribal people, which was previously unused to paying any rent other than a token quit-rent to the manki or munda (village headmen).
The query around r2r in general is not a new one – see for example Appadurai’s widely cited 2006 paper by the same name, or SPARC’s Coalition formed back in 2009. Lokesh attempts to find grounding for it in Indian law through the current post.
For only the second time since the CAFC’s 2009 decision in In re Bose , the Board upheld a claim of fraud, ordering cancellation of a registration for the mark FUJIIRYOKI for massage chairs. The Board found that Fuji was the owner of the mark and that Shen’s claim of ownership was a false and material representation.
For only the second time since the CAFC's 2009 decision in In re Bose , the Board upheld a claim of fraud, ordering cancellation of a registration for the mark FUJIIRYOKI for massage chairs. 2009); Nationstar Mortg. Fuji Medical Instruments Mfg. American Crocodile International Group, Inc. Cancellation No. In re Bose Corp. ,
Hence, it is no wonder that the battle for ownership of her trademark is also highly sought after. Over time, the trademark underwent five changes before returning to its original form in 2009. This transformation has elevated Barbie to the status of a widely recognized cultural icon.
One person who clearly didn’t understand this was Mr Gu who set up a Chinese takeaway in Barrow-in-Furness in 2009 using the name China Tang. Understanding the legal rules around names is important because they’re the single most valuable intellectual property asset a successful business builds. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.
In 2009, Respondent Nema Foods filed an application to register the mark, When Nema Kimya became defunct, petitioner began exporting its products directly to respondent. The Board observed that "[m]erely being a distributor does not confer ownership of a mark for the goods being distributed.
Lanham Act false advertising: The theory was that Meta misrepresented “the creation and ownership” of Logan’s photos. But the claim still failed for failure to plead registration of those photos, though again there was leave to amend. Baden Sports, Inc. Molten USA, Inc., 3d 1300 (Fed.
Documents required to be filed online along with the application are as follows: Proof of ownership of the IPR and copies of the corresponding registration certificate. Images of genuine goods (for trademarks and designs). Images of infringing goods (if applicable/available).
x] It is challenging to accurately identify and follow the knowledge holders [xi] , partly because complex group ownership. A “community rights regime,” in which Indigenous Peoples possess ownership rights to TK instead of a small number of capitalist proprietors [xvi] , is one concept. ix] Ibid. [x]
It identifies the product of that company and recognizes its own and gives some rights to ownership that can be enforced. For example, in 2009 the owner of a physical TASER gun sued Liden Lab stating that the users of Second Life are infringing the TASER’s trademark by creating a version of the TASER gun and trading them in Second Life.
2009) (“Mere adoption (selection) of a mark accompanied by preparations to begin its use are insufficient for claiming ownership of and applying to register the mark.”); Mars Generation v. & Rehab., 123 USPQ2d at 1029 (“mere preparation and publication of future plans do not constitute use in commerce”); Aycock Eng’g, Inc.
The question of ownership in the virtual world, particularly in video games, has long been debated. Interestingly, there was also a time when the government issued the Protection, Conservation, and Effective Management of Traditional Knowledge relating to Biological Diversity Rules, 2009. While the terms like virtual reality, AI, etc.,
Shamnad Basheer 1976-2019; taken at NUJS, Kolkata circa 2009. The Court expressly held that ownership of copyright by producers does not limit the composers copyright. Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Announcing the 2024 Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition on Intellectual Property Law Prof (Dr.)
General Motors pledged its “Green Technology” patents for a period of 2 years when it faced bankruptcy in 2009. The agreement lays down conditions for patent ownership in the event of default. In 2009, State Bank of India advanced a loan of over Rs. This was done during 2012-2015 when it faced bankruptcy. Case Studies.
These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws. Of note, in DRG Inc.
District Judge Fischer granted the defendant’s motion , stating, “Given that one of the core disputes in this case concerns ownership of the copyright in the Illustration, which is governed by U.K. Not only is her now deceased grandfather unable to testify, but the defendants have found ample evidence to disprove ownership.
Licensing vs. Ownership: Most digital goods are distributed under licenses that impose restrictions on resale rights. The court held that: Reproduction vs. Transfer: Digital resale almost always involves the creation of a duplicate file rather than a straightforward transfer.
The Claimants argued that the Bitcoin File Format was fixed when Dr Wright first ran the program underlying the Bitcoin System in 2009 and the “Genesis Block” was written into the Blockchain System in a form that reflected the Bitcoin File Format.
Regardless of who invested how much, Janssen does have ownership over at least 5 patents, as mentioned above, and this is what we look at below. One of these (1220/MUMNP/2009) was rejected by the Indian patent office earlier this year. Fn 12 of the same paper). As mentioned above, there are 4 more applications.
The dispute concerned the geographical indication "Salaparuta" for Sicilian wine, which received protection in Italy in 2006, and then was registered as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) by the European Commission in 2009. The wine brand had been around since the nineteenth century but changed ownership a few times.
In the EU, Article 4(2) of the InfoSoc Directive specifically addresses exhaustion, stating that the distribution right of the copyright holder is exhausted within the EU after the first sale or other transfer of ownership of a copy of a work with the rightholder’s consent.
The Safarov case In 2009, Safarov authors a book. But last year, one supranational interference with copyright law surprisingly did not come from Luxemburg, but from Strasbourg: the judgment in Safarov v Azerbaijan. An NGO makes his entire work available for download. He sues for copyright infringement and claims damages.
Ownership of the registration was subsequently transferred to Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd (the predecessor to Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd, ‘the applicant’). How it begins.
In the EU, a 2009 court ruling established a test that describes originality as requiring an “author’s own intellectual creation.” For now, at least in Canada, ownership will be assigned to the person who arranged to create the work and not the AI that created the work itself. an author’s employer or publisher).
We then turn to the amendment of specifications in Chapter 17, followed by discussion of devolution, assignments, licences, co-ownership, and registration in Chapter 18. The latter chapter includes discussion of the most recent judgments on the (still unresolved) question of whether the so-called Formstein defence exists in the UK.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content