This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As a result, the rise of hypersensitivity to religion, religious texts, and religious symbols determines the jurisprudence around the utilisation of such marks under Indian trademarklaw, even if they are not strictly prohibited. Gebi Products [10] , The Gala Company used the label mark “LAXMI” to market brooms.
Ali Shayif (2009) ( paywalled ) which has been cited numerous times by the Supreme Court and numerous High Courts of India ( here and here ). Existing trademarklaws sufficiently address online infringement without needing a new “e-infringement” category. E-Infringement Merely Academic Distinction?
These E-commerce platforms make it simple to access consumer goods from a computer or smart phone, but they also, by their very nature, make it simple for counterfeiters to market their counterfeit goods. In the year 2017 the market value of the E-commerce was $38.5 27-10-2009). [8] Nakul Bajaj &Ors, [Civil Suit No.
The recently published Draft Amendment to the Chinese TrademarkLaw is proposing the introduction of important changes to the current trademark system in China. The draft Article 18 TrademarkLaw correctly removes the distinction between registered and unregistered well-known marks. For example, the actual art.
The recently published Draft Amendment to the Chinese TrademarkLaw is proposing the introduction of important changes to the current trademark system in China. The draft Article 18 TrademarkLaw correctly removes the distinction between registered and unregistered well-known marks. For example, the actual art.
In this post, I extend it by highlighting HCU’s history arguing that HCU is a principle of trademarklaw and not just a provision limited to Section 12. In the KEI cases, KEI Industries claimed the adoption of the mark KEI in 1968 for manufacturing, marketing and selling wires and cables. However, much has changed after that.
Introduction In today’s digital economy, trademarks play an important role in developing a brand’s identity, establishing customer trust, and assuring market competition. Trademark violation raises significant issues. Cybersquatting is another type of trademark infringement.
It apparently conducted market research and discovered that P&P was one of the most successful sellers on Amazon in this category. In March 2019, P&P sued Johnson Enterprises for trade dress infringement under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act and unfair competition under California law. Art Attacks Ink, LLC v.
Trademarks displayed in audiovisual works can be a real headache if the associated legal aspects fail to be taken into account. Both Spanish and European trademarklaws and case law have shed some light in this regard. However, there are still some grey areas clouding this issue. Supreme Court Judgment no.
An interim injunction was granted to the plaintiff in 2009 and through the present judgement, the court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. A legal notice had been issued to the defendant on September 27, 2007 and this was subsequently followed by an interim injunction on September 10, 2009.
As a result, the logo and name are registered as trademarks under the act of 1999 to protect the brand name and value. Trademark Infringement. The trademark legislation of 1999 protects Indian trademarks. The respondent was the first to enter the market and use the mark, according to the court. Bisleri Pvt.
As a result, the logo and name are registered as trademarks under the act of 1999 to protect the brand name and value. Trademark Infringement. The trademark legislation of 1999 protects Indian trademarks. The respondent was the first to enter the market and use the mark, according to the court. Bisleri Pvt.
What is trademark infringement? Let’s start with the basics; what is trademark infringement? Imagine you’ve conjured up the hottest brand on the market – “Crispy Crunch Delights” , complete with a jazzy logo. Learn more about distinctive trademarks. We explore in this article.
Thus in Pratibha Singh vs Singh & Associates 5 , the plaintiff had been using the mark ‘Singh & Singh’ since the year 2002 and it had been granted registration in 2009. Further, the court held that the defendant was using and registered the ‘ELVISLY YOURS’ mark and his goods have gained reputation in the market. Conclusion.
Basheer, in his 2009 post, about Chantix, a Pfizer-patented anti-smoking drug, raised questions regarding transparency around the discretion to require local clinical trials. The vacated order restrained Google from infringing Consim’s trademark on Bharat Matrimony. “Ad-word” and Class 5.2 Let’s see how it unfolded.
In 2009, the Right to Information Act was still in its infancy and the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, was an institution still cloaked in secrecy. In 2009, the Right to Information Act was still in its infancy and the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, was an institution still cloaked in secrecy.
In addition, the opinion has important ramifications for domestic trademarklaw through its identification of “use in commerce” as the actionable domestic conduct. Now in trademarklaw, extraterritorial reach is a simple on-off switch: Is there use in commerce or not? Google Inc. In Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc.
The first and the foremost question which crosses our minds is that does the digital assets in the virtual reality fall under the category of “Goods” under trademarklaw, and who should be held liable for infringement when the infringer is unknown. It also protects the product from unauthorized use by a third party.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content