2009 Litigation Trademark Law 
IP and Legal Filings
FEBRUARY 2, 2024
As a result, the rise of hypersensitivity to religion, religious texts, and religious symbols determines the jurisprudence around the utilisation of such marks under Indian trademark law, even if they are not strictly prohibited. 6] Section 9(2)(b) of the Indian Trademarks Act, 1999. [7] 7] 2005 (3) AWC 2097. [8]
Likelihood of Confusion
AUGUST 10, 2024
Originally posted 2009-09-30 23:33:13. The post More oozes out from the Kinderstart litigation appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. Republished by Blog Post PromoterEric Goldman has the transcript from the oral argument we reported on last month. He’s still betting on Google.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Tech Blog
APRIL 17, 2023
The recently published Draft Amendment to the Chinese Trademark Law is proposing the introduction of important changes to the current trademark system in China. The draft Article 18 Trademark Law correctly removes the distinction between registered and unregistered well-known marks. For example, the actual art.
IP and Legal Filings
MARCH 5, 2024
Using trademarks in domain names, linking, framing, meta-tagging, and framing are a few methods that could lead to trademark challenges. Cybersquatting is another type of trademark infringement. A fundamental tenet of trademark law is to avoid consumers being confused about the origin or source of products or services.
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 30, 2023
An interim injunction was granted to the plaintiff in 2009 and through the present judgement, the court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. A legal notice had been issued to the defendant on September 27, 2007 and this was subsequently followed by an interim injunction on September 10, 2009.
The IP Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
The Ninth Circuit cautioned that a plaintiff is “not required to preemptively conduct consumer surveys in anticipation of litigation.” Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. 3d 1138, 1145 (9 th Cir. Rather, courts have routinely “admitted surveys conducted years after the first alleged infringing use.”
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 23, 2023
In 2009, the Right to Information Act was still in its infancy and the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, was an institution still cloaked in secrecy. In 2009, the Right to Information Act was still in its infancy and the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, was an institution still cloaked in secrecy.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content