The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 24, 2023

In my opinion, there has never been any talk of such works, because that would be the same as talking about non-distinctive trademarks. 340 (1991) , Case C-5/08, Infopaq (2009) , Eastern Book v. Just as when two painters, setting up their easels in the same place and painting the same landscape, create two independent works (p.

Copyright 138

Copyright Derivative Work Music Copying 138

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. See generally A.V. Vanderhye v. iParadigms, LLC ,562 F.3d 3d 630 (4th Cir. Google, Inc. , 3d 202, (2d Cir. HathiTrust 755 F.3d

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 105

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. ” Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. See generally A.V. Vanderhye v. iParadigms, LLC ,562 F.3d 3d 630 (4th Cir.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. See generally A.V. Vanderhye v. iParadigms, LLC ,562 F.3d 3d 630 (4th Cir. Google, Inc. , 3d 202, (2d Cir. HathiTrust 755 F.3d

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 40