Remove 2009 Remove Copyright Law Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Traditional Tattoos on the Red Carpet: Continuing the Conversation of Collective Ownership

IPilogue

These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws.

Ownership 102
article thumbnail

Right to Research (“R2R”): An Independent Right with an Imposed Dependence in Copyright Law?

SpicyIP

The query around r2r in general is not a new one – see for example Appadurai’s widely cited 2006 paper by the same name, or SPARC’s Coalition formed back in 2009. Lokesh attempts to find grounding for it in Indian law through the current post. a user right under copyright law. Lokesh Vyas.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Copyright and the Digital First Sale Doctrine: A Comparative Review

Intepat

Introduction The principle of the first sale doctrine is a basic precept of copyright law allowing the lawful possessor of a copyrighted work to resell, lend, or distribute that work without the permission of the copyright holder. Conclusion The digital-first sale doctrine remains an open area of copyright law.

article thumbnail

Smells Like Copyright Infringement

IPilogue

copyright law, a particularly confusing subject for foreign works published before 1978. copyright law. Drawing on Twin Books , they argued, “a publication of a work in the United States without the statutory notice of copyright fell into the public domain,” as per the U.S. Copyright Act of 1909.

article thumbnail

Securing Copyright Protection for AI-generate Generated Creations – A Business Perspective

IPilogue

By comparison, the US Copyright Office Review Board has decided that obtaining copyright protection requires human authorship , citing that copyright law only protects those works that “are founded in the creative powers of the mind.”. Countless more AI creations may be underway. . The Legal Conundrum.

Business 118
article thumbnail

Copyright, Upcycling, and the Human Right to Environmental Protection

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In the EU, Article 4(2) of the InfoSoc Directive specifically addresses exhaustion, stating that the distribution right of the copyright holder is exhausted within the EU after the first sale or other transfer of ownership of a copy of a work with the rightholder’s consent. What could this mean for copyright-relevant upcycling?

Copyright 124
article thumbnail

Amazon Owns Your E-Books and Wants More

SpicyIP

Through the Copyright Amendment Act, 2012, DRM and TPMs received a legal sanction as the newly introduced Section 65A (1) criminalised the act of circumventing the DRM with the intention to infringe on copyright laws. In 2009 , users woke up to find their purchased copy of 1984 had disappeared from their library.

Copying 59