The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 24, 2023

In my opinion, there has never been any talk of such works, because that would be the same as talking about non-distinctive trademarks. 340 (1991) , Case C-5/08, Infopaq (2009) , Eastern Book v. So, there is no literal and non-literal copying of a work. Rural, 499 U.S. Modak (2008) 1 SCC 1 ). This is pure fiction.

Copyright 138

Copyright Derivative Work Music Copying 138

Copyright Lately

MAY 6, 2022

The first thing that’s important to understand is that buying a copy of a creative work, even if it happens to the only copy in existence, doesn’t give you any copyright interest in the work. So, if you buy a copy of “Dune,” you can read it. Want to Create New Derivative Works?

Derivative Work 82

Derivative Work Licensing Artwork Contracts 82

Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

so-called “non-expressive” use in which copying is undertaken not to distribute the copied material directly or indirectly but rather for some other purpose. The FTC Comments do not explicitly refer to or analyze the substantial body of court decisions holding that a range of non-expressive uses of copyrighted works are fair uses.

Copyright 96

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 96

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. Second, the number of copies/downloads/users/seat licenses model simply does not work in the AI training context.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 105

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. Second, the number of copies/downloads/users/seat licenses model simply does not work in the AI training context.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

2009); Authors Guild v. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. Second, the number of copies/downloads/users/seat licenses model simply does not work in the AI training context.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 40

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 3, 2023

Originality is the quality that distinguishes produced or invented works from copies, clones, forgeries, or derivative works by being new or novel. The papers were taken from copies of the examination papers that students provided, not from publications by the University of London Press Ltd. 1] [1916] 2 Ch 601. [2]

Copyright 96

Copyright Public Domain Copying Publishing 96