This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
2024) ( Apple Stay Denial ) After initially granting a temporary reprieve, the Federal Circuit has now denied Apple’s stay pending appeal of the International Trade Commission’s limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist order (“the Remedial Orders”) against Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2. 418 (2009). See Nken v.
It owned a figurative EU trade mark containing the word ' HEITECH ', registered in 2008 and used since 6 May 2009 at the latest. It was only in April 2009 that the plaintiff sent a warning letter to the defendant, requesting that it cease and desist from using 'HEITECH' as a trade mark and company name.
If we didn’t know better, we might conclude that ‘Cuevana’ is Spanish for ‘mole’ The popular streaming piracy brand first appeared on the radar in 2009 and anti-piracy forces have been trying to ‘whack’ it ever since.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted.
One of the post- AMG predictions about Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) law enforcement is that we will see more administrative litigation. But generally, most things are handled by the ALJ, who oversees discovery and will eventually issue an initial decision, with findings of fact, conclusions of law and an appropriate order.
Trademark Law Before pre-digitalization The US Trademark Office (USPTO) defines a trademark as a word, phrase, design, or symbol that serves to identify and distinguish the products or services you sell apart from those of others. In addition, trademark law seeks to safeguard a mark’s good name and reputation among customers.
The 2009 Facebook Terms included the following clause: “accessing or using our website. at 18 (quoting the 2009 version of the Terms at issue in Fteja v. precedent, could Meta just amend its terms, send another cease-and-desist, and revisit this, or does this case repudiate that whole line of precedent? Meta’s Opp.
SMRI’s predecessor in interest did business with the relevant defendants from at least 1999-2009; resold products bearing “Sturgis Motor Classic” in its own retail store; and never complained about the use of “Sturgis” or “Sturgis Motor Classic” on rally products. Laches also applied to the state law deceptive trade practices claim.
Taco John’s registered the mark in 1989, and Gregory Hotel registered the mark for concurrent use in New Jersey in 2009 based on its common law use dating back to 1979. Taco John’s is reportedly notorious for sending cease-and-desist letters to those who use the mark. The Lanham Act, which governs U.S.
Shikhar is a second-year law student at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. He shares a keen interest in developments concerning IP Law.] They further argued that they had issued a cease and desist notice on 6th November, 2020 to which no response was received. Important IP cases that we’re missing out on?
Common trademark violations Navigating the waters of trademark laws can sometimes feel like you’re trying to solve a puzzle blindfolded—confusing, right? Even with innocent intentions, these trademark violations can attract legal eagles faster than you can say, “cease and desist.”
First, the ITC has a compressed procedural schedule , so a case can proceed to the equivalent of a trial before an Administrative Law Judge in less than a year. the ITC can also issue cease and desist orders to prevent further sales of the accused products. 16, 2009). [11] More questions? Containing Same , Inv.
In 2009, Prof. Most recently, Shivam Kaushik penned a well-worded post on DHC’s Novartis Moment & Indian Patent Law’s Déjà Vu. There’s a reason why it’s only once in the life of Indian patent law that a CL was granted, check Prof. among others. Sai Vinod’s post can get you some intellectual relief. Perhaps not.
Capitol Records (the successor to EMI) sent its first cease-and-desist letter to Vimeo in 2008 and sued Vimeo for copyright infringement in 2009. ” “Plaintiffs contend that they showed that the Vimeo staff had legal acumen as to copyright laws. Vimeo appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content