IP and Legal Filings

JUNE 12, 2023

In relation to ‘Parodies’, since it is derived from the original work of another writer or artist, it is difficult to draw a line between creative criticism and imitation. Vipul Amrutlal Shah (2009) and MRF Limited v. The Supreme Court’s decisions in the case of Shree Ventakesh Films (SVF) v.

Copyright Law 105

Copyright Law Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 105

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws. Of note, in DRG Inc.

Ownership 102

Ownership Intellectual Property Artwork Copyright Law 102

IIPRD

AUGUST 11, 2023

No strict actions are taken against these infringements; in fact, in a Supreme Court case in Japan in 2009 [1] the creator of file sharing program known as ‘Winny’ was not found guilty of infringing content through providing file-sharing software and his actual intent of legitimate legal use was considered over the alleged infringement.

Art 52

Art IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 3, 2023

The word “originality” is frequently used in conjunction with the creativity of writers, thinkers, and artists. The Copyright , Designs and Patents Act of 1988 in the United Kingdom specifies in Section (1)(1)(a) that copyright exists in “original literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works.” 4] 499 U.S.

Copyright 98

Copyright Public Domain Copying Publishing 98

IIPRD

OCTOBER 17, 2022

For example, in 2009 the owner of a physical TASER gun sued Liden Lab stating that the users of Second Life are infringing the TASER’s trademark by creating a version of the TASER gun and trading them in Second Life. Copyright Infringement. Copyright is a legal right of the owner of intellectual property.

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Trademark 52

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2024

Countrywide Promoters Private Limited vs Navraj Infratech Private Limited on 19 September, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant for copyright infringement, passing off, and unfair trade practices regarding an architectural design, the “Artistic Work/Device” created by Upton-Hansen Architects Ltd.

Trademark 105

Trademark Confidentiality Patent Application Registration 105