43(B)log

AUGUST 18, 2021

were valid and infringed, but the latter wasn’t counterfeited; SMRI’s dilution victory was vacated, but not its victories on deceptive trade practices, ACPA, false advertising, and unfair competition. It was thus barred from equitable relief for its trademark infringement, false advertising, and state deceptive trade practices claims.

Cease and Desist 64

Cease and Desist False Advertising Registration Licensing 64

43(B)log

AUGUST 17, 2021

Plaintiffs sued for false advertising and false endorsement under the Lanham Act, violation of their right to publicity, deceptive trade practices under New York GBL Section 349, and defamation. 2021), which considered all these claims except for false advertising. The court was guided by Electra v. 3d 233 (2d Cir.

Social Media 45

Social Media False Advertising Advertising Advertising 45

43(B)log

AUGUST 28, 2024

Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for false advertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. Thus, the district court did not err by declining to instruct the jury on the safe harbor provision.

Law 59

Law Advertising Advertising False Advertising 59

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 23, 2022

according to their website, was formed by Monte McClung in 2009 after a 20 year Career at Gema. 271 , Trademark Infringement, Trademark Counterfeiting, and Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, and False Advertising, under 15 U.S.C. §§ 114 and 1125(a). The Defendant, First in Finishing, Inc.,

Trademark 40

Trademark False Advertising Patent Registration 40

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 26, 2021

No decision I have found fully addresses what standing limits there are on Article I courts; the Court of Federal Claims applies Art. III standing requirements despite being an Article I court, e.g., Weeks Marine, Inc. United States, 575 F.3d 3d 1352, 1359 (Fed. Apparently there is a dispute over whether Art. III applies in bankruptcy court.)

Law 83

Law Art False Advertising Advertising 83

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 8, 2021

ThermoLife’s website also advertises its “Patented Nitrate Technology.” (DE But a factfinder could conclude that “the challenged advertising statements are material in that the statements involve inherent qualities or characteristics of the CRTN-3 product that could influence a consumer’s decision to purchase the product.”

Patent 45

Patent Advertising Advertising Licensing 45

43(B)log

AUGUST 18, 2022

The district court certified a class of those who purchased the coffeemaker at a New Mexico Wal-Mart store from 2009 to 2013, approximately 40,600 members. The coffeemaker evidently proved unsatisfactory, and the Pumas sued.

Trademark 64

Trademark Licensing Branding Brands 64

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. with highest honors from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2009.

Due Diligence 59

Due Diligence Patent Prosecution Litigation Intellectual Property 59

43(B)log

MARCH 20, 2023

The state alleged that Plavix was less effective in patients who had certain liver-enzyme mutations, and that defendants knew this fact years before 2009, when the FDA updated Plavix’s label with information about the issue. In 2009, a BMS employee wrote: [I]t looks like we are into stalling some more.

Law 45

Law Advertising Advertising Journalism 45

43(B)log

APRIL 12, 2024

Defendants retained and produced only California calls, but, based on the testimony in the case, the court concluded that the total number of misleading calls placed by defendants from March 2009 through April 2020 was 1,243,099.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Law Reporting Marketing 59

43(B)log

AUGUST 9, 2021

2021) Plaintiffs/Debtors argued, and the court held in relevant part, that defendants (Charter) breached the automatic stay by a literally false and intentionally misleading advertising campaign to induce the Debtors’ customers to terminate their agreements with the Debtors by telling them that bankruptcy risked impairment of their service.

False Advertising 119

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Law 119