This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To answer that and other questions about Halloween costumes, we have to step back and look at how copyright and trademarklaw apply to costumes. Halloween costumes sit at an interesting and muddled intersection between copyright and trademarklaw. Copyright and Halloween Costumes. Bottom Line.
[Posted December 1, 2008.] December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. The post Best of 2008: Tackiness not grounds for refusal to register appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. Otherwise, why would John Welch be reporting this appeal?: 78666598 [Refusal to register.
In 2008 Meenaxi began filling the US demand with its own version version of the drinks. A case like this begins with the territorial doctrine of trademarklaw: Under the territoriality doctrine, a trademark is recognized as having a separate existence in each sovereign territory in which it is registered or legally recognized as a mark.
While NFT platforms are not yet specifically regulated, they are subject to the provisions on Electronic System Providers (“ESPs”) contained in several regulations, as follows: • Law No. 11 of 2008, dated April 21, 2008, regarding Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended by Law No 19 of 2016, dated November 25, 2016.•
A critical issue to be addressed is whether these limited-edition products can get protection under Intellectual Property (IP) law, just as regular products do, and if yes, then which is the most appropriate form of IP Protection ? Protection for Limited Edition Products under TrademarkLaw.
The presence of cryptocurrency is constantly growing, and therefore, it needs the law to transform along with it to address its administration and execution. Several courts have had trouble in applying substantive TrademarkLaw to this field of technology. Can Cryptocurrencies be Protected under the TrademarkLaw?
regarding the use of the ZARA trademark. We will examine the impact of the ruling in cases involving the use of third-party trademarks. They claimed the lawfulness of such use under the limitations specified in Article 37 of the TrademarkLaw, both in its original version and as modified by Directive 2015/2436.
[viii] This massive dichotomy in prices forces fans to choose between the Scylla of paying hundreds of dollars for a jersey to support their favorite team because of sports licensing monopolies, and the Charybdis of perpetuating trademark infringement by knowingly or unknowingly patronizing these shady, unregulated vendors. (ii)
Even though the last 250 GTO models were produced in the 60s, Ferrari had only registered a 250 GTO trademark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘EUIPO’) in 2008. Another car company, ARES Design, announced its plans to bring a modern take on the classic 250 GTO model in 2018.
2] Adidas vs. Payless ShoeSource: This 2008 case highlighted the importance of protecting a trademark within the fashion industry. It is this judgment that more or less laid the foundation of “trans-border reputation” in Indian trademarklaw. Dongre and Ors. V Whirlpool Co.
However, the same process does not include any examination or verification to determine whether the domain name is distinctive or capable of distinguishing itself from the competition, i.e., existing domain names that are clearly in violation of trademarklaw. 1, 8-72, (2008). first appeared on IPLF.
We are pleased to bring to you a guest post by Naman Keswani on the concept of naked licensing within trademarkslaw. Naman is a fourth-year student at the Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur who has a keen interest in Intellectual Property Law, especially TrademarkLaw.
In Trademarklaw, it is important to determine if the mark is being used to offer goods and services similar to the ones for which it is registered. Parle Agro (2008), the BHC said that where both parties enjoy a TM due to their lineage from the family, one cannot restrict the other from using the name. In Parle Products v.
European trademarklaw requires genuine use of a trademark to maintain registration. Lack of use may cancel a trademark’s registration; as well, any oppositions based on a trademark without genuine use may not withstand a non-usage defense. . Photo Credits: BP Miller ( Unsplash).
The Trademarklaw in India, known as Trade Marks Act, 1999, comes into force according to the rules established under the International Principles laid down in TRIPS (Trademark-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement).
Then again, Seattle has been a target city for an NBA expansion team or franchise relocation since the departure of the Seattle SuperSonics to Oklahoma City in 2008. With that said, it seems that Seattle may not be the most obvious location for Starbucks Stadium or Starbucks Arena after all.
a 501(c)(3) organization created to solicit and manage resources on behalf of Louisiana Tech University ("LTF"), alleged that a Florida corporation, Bel-Mac Roofing ("Bel-Mac"), violated numerous federal and Louisiana state laws by infringing copyright and trademark rights LTF has in the logo for Louisiana Tech's Bulldog mascot.
While doing so, the Court disregarded many of the foreign judgements cited by Google which held invisible use of trademarks as failing to constitute infringement; and highlighted the stark differences in trademarklaw in each jurisdiction, especially when compared to India. 2008 (38) PTC (416) (Del). IMG Technologies Pvt.
Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. In 2008, it launched its successful “Align” yoga mat line. Aliign sued lululemon for trademark infringement. lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company.
regarding the use of the ZARA trademark, as previously discussed here. In other words, the scope of the first wording of Article 37 was more limited, as it only referred to the use, in the course of trade, of the trademark when it was necessary to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service.
He was unmistakably aware of the nuances regarding colours in trademarklaw. Broadly speaking, trademarks are of two types: traditional and non-traditional. [1] Notwithstanding the essence of this finding, this is too narrow an interpretation of the true spirit of trademarklaw. 63 at paragraph 15. [23]
Aside from various journals, his writings can be found at SpicyIP.com where he has been writing since 2008. His areas of focus include international IP policy, IP & development, and IP & Health.
Trademarks displayed in audiovisual works can be a real headache if the associated legal aspects fail to be taken into account. Both Spanish and European trademarklaws and case law have shed some light in this regard. However, there are still some grey areas clouding this issue.
In 2008, Congress added 17 U.S.C. § Copyright Office, Annual Report of the Register of Copyrights, Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2008 , at 12–13 (2008). 110-617 , at 23 (2008) (emphasis added). Whimsicality, Inc. Rubie’s Costume Co. , 112, 115 (S.D.N.Y. 411(b) to the Copyright Act.
The Federal Circuit’s pair of decisions provide guidance on how logos factor into the design patent infringement inquiry, and begin to tease-out differences in policy concerns underlying design patent law versus trademarklaw. See Egyptian Goddess, Inc. Swisa, Inc., 3d 665(Fed.
This was apparently untrue and in a separate 2008 proceeding, the PTO concluded that this was a false statement, at least as to boots, and cancelled TA’s registration of the METAL mark. In 1999, he registered the “METAL” mark on TA’s behalf for use on various clothing items, including jeans, shirts and boots.
19] Being able to distinguish one’s trademark falls at the centre of the trademarklaw, as otherwise, it is liable to be rejected under Section 9(1) of the Act. 34] Haptic Trade Mark Application (Case I ZB 73/05) [2008] E.T.M.R. 33] Neoperl v EUIPO (Représentation d´un insert sanitaire cylindrique) ECLI:EU:T:2022:780. [34]
2008) (en banc) and Gorham Co. I think of the design patent test as quite close to likelihood of confusion in trademarklaw, but design and trademark pedants yell whenever I make this comparison. Seirus has now petitioned for writ of certiorari. Swisa, Inc. , 3d 665 (Fed. White , 81 U.S. 511 (1871).
The Recording of Court Proceedings in 2008: In October 2008, Mihir discussed a case in the Supreme Court that considered recording its proceedings as a move toward judicial transparency. The issue is also discussed in his and Dinesh Thakur’s book ‘The Truth Pill: The Myth of Drug Regulation in India. Let’s see how it unfolded.
Interestingly, the judgment (dated May 1, 2024) by the Delhi High Court covers multitude of legal intricacies of trademark regime, making this judgement a rich resource for a trademarklaw enthusiast seeking a holistic understanding of the subject. Pfizer Products Inc., (the
According to the decision, under the current laws to be an inventor, there must be “intentionality and culpability”, which AI lacks because it cannot legally enter into contracts. Trademarklaw One of the areas where both trademarks and AI intersect with each other is in creation of new brands and trademarks.
In order to maintain the owner’s rights, a trademark must be used and periodically renewed; otherwise, the proprietor might lose the validity and the right of enforcing the trademark. TOSIBA Appliances [2008 (37) PTC 394] Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Effect Of Non-Use Of Trademark first appeared on IPLF.
Placing emphasis of judgements of Supreme Court in Khoday Distilleries Limited vs. The Scotch Whisky Association 2008 (10) SCC 723 and of High Court of Bombay in Carew Phipson Ltd. Deejay Distilleries (P) Ltd.
The case was filed before the Delhi High Court in 2008 and heard by Justice Bhat. The first was a case where Petronet tried using the law on confidentiality to gag reportage and the second was a case where the Tata group in an uncharacteristic lapse of judgement tried using trademarklaw to shut down a website setup by Greenpeace.
For example, the first sound mark in India was registered for Yahoo in 2008, and an Indian bank later received a sound even though Indian law at the time did not expressly specify that sound marks were allowed. .; see also par. Outside of the EU and the US, sound marks have also been recognized—and debated.
Intellectual property rights protection to the fashion industry Trademark Act: Trademark Act plays a significant role in preserving a brand’s legitimacy and integrity, which is advantageous for the industry. However, the protection of fashion designs by trademarklaw is not perfected.
Finally, Apple uses its trademarks largely within its marketing strategies in such a way that they are displayed in advertisements, product packaging, and retail shops, which serves to sustain its high-tech and premium brand image. Recent developments include e-filing and expedited examination procedures designed to facilitate registration.
I disagreed , and continue to think the Court will uphold the constitutionality of Section 2(c), but the question is what free speech doctrine(s) the Justices will use to make this determination and whether they will provide additional guidance on evaluating First Amendment challenges to trademarklaws.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content