article thumbnail

Professional Photographer Files Copyright Infringement Suit Against Used Car Dealers

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

in Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin and has since combined his love for photographic art and computer science by building an online system to help protect artistsworks on the internet. They serve over 100 million shoppers annually and work directly with over 22,500 dealerships nationwide.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities

IIPRD

IPR is the right for the ownership of the property which is not tangible and is the result of your intellect. It provides legal entitlements that cover the privileges granted to individuals who are the creators of original work, stemming from their intellectual creativity or capability. 3] PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MANUAL. [4]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Protection of Trademarks in Philippines

IP and Legal Filings

Jurisprudence has also established the doctrine of prior use as a basis for trademark ownership. A logo or device (excluding word elements) may be considered an artistic work and subject to copyright protection. 1, Series of 2008, the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000. Conclusion.

article thumbnail

AI Generated Art and its conflict with IPR

IIPRD

This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. There is a need to shed light on the legal status of AI which can help the courts determine whether they are eligible to ownership rights of copyright for their work or not. & LEGAL RSCH.

Art 52
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (June 28 – July 4)

SpicyIP

Copyright Ownership in State Board Textbooks: Impediments to Accessibility. Shri Mahaveer Jain Industries , noted the defendant’s acknowledgment of the proprietary rights of the plaintiff in its distinctive original artistic work i.e., ‘Elle 18 face’ used in relation to the plaintiff’s nail polishes. Thematic Highlight.

article thumbnail

Limited Edition Products and their IP Protection

IIPRD

A trademark, on the other hand, exclusively identifies a product as belonging to a specific company and recognizes the company’s ownership of the brand. According to the Indian Design Act, if your design is registered under the Designs Act it is not eligible for protection under Copyright Act, even if it is artistic work.

Editing 52
article thumbnail

Fashion Imitations and Legal Threads: Navigating Intellectual Property Rights in India

IIPRD

Ltd [6] , Mr. Masrani, the defendant, plagiarized the design and artistic work of Mr. Tarun, the plaintiff. Mr. Tharun and his company designed and produced a minimum of twenty models with distinctive designs and creative work that was either printed or stitched onto the fabric. 7] The Copyright Act, 1957, s 44. [8]