article thumbnail

Understanding IPO’s Rejection of UPL’s Patent Application for Mancozeb and Ortho Silicic Acid Combination in Light of the Patent Bargain and Sufficiency of Disclosure

SpicyIP

Recently, the Indian Patent Office rejected a patent application by UPL Ltd. for lack of sufficient disclosure mandated under Section 10(4) of the Patents Act. It is in this light that the recent order by the Indian Patent Office (IPO) rejecting UPL’s patent application (pdf) becomes important.

article thumbnail

New PatentlyO L.J. Article: The AIA at Ten – How Much Do the Pre-AIA Prior Art Rules Still Matter?

Patently-O

Though patents filed before the transition date will remain in force up through March 2033, a good 10+ years away, teachers may also be wondering which regime to emphasize and for how long the pre-AIA rules will still be considered fundamental rather than footnote material. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?

Art 126
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Can an Abandoned Patent Application be Revived?

Intepat

Upon notification, the applicant is expected to reply to the objections within six months, or the applicant can take an extension of another 3 months for filing of the reply. If the applicant fails to file a reply to the objections, the application is deemed to be abandoned. Union of India & Ors. [WP

article thumbnail

New PatentlyO L.J. Article: The AIA at Ten – How Much Do the Pre-AIA Prior Art Rules Still Matter?

Patently-O

Though patents filed before the transition date will remain in force up through March 2033, a good 10+ years away, teachers may also be wondering which regime to emphasize and for how long the pre-AIA rules will still be considered fundamental rather than footnote material. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?

article thumbnail

Gone Up In Smoke: Analysing the Controller’s Rejection of an E-cigarette Patent under Section 3(b)

SpicyIP

Assistant Controller Of Patents And Design accepting an appeal against the Controller’s decision rejecting a patent application for “aerosol generating article with multi material susceptor.” Understanding Why the Patent Application Went Up in Flames The patent application (no.

Invention 110
article thumbnail

Enablement Requirements For Patents in India

Intepat

The idea here is that the inventor must disclose at the time of the application what is, in his or her opinion as to the maker, the most preferred way of carrying out the invention at the time the patent application is filed. Also, in the case of Tata Global Beverages Limited v.

Patent 98
article thumbnail

Spotting the difference between the priority document and the claims (T 1303/18)

The IPKat

Patent applicants should be aware that even the most subtle of differences between the claims and the priority document can be fatal to priority claim and thus to the validity of a patent in the case of intervening prior art. The patent was granted with a priority date of 28 Nov 2007.