Remove 2007 Remove Invention Remove Litigation Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

The IP Law Blog

Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? In 2021, HIP sued Hormel, challenging Hormel’s ownership and the inventorship of U.S. To be a joint inventor, “a person must make a significant contribution to the invention as claimed. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”).

Inventor 110
article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

LexBlog IP

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? In 2021, HIP sued Hormel, challenging Hormel’s ownership and the inventorship of U.S. To be a joint inventor, “a person must make a significant contribution to the invention as claimed.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

So You Say You Want a Bifurcation: Imposing Order and Framing the Issues in a Chaotic Trade Secrets Case

LexBlog IP

2007); see also Firstenergy Solutions Corp. A case that I recently litigated illustrates how this can work. Dircksen , an employer and former employee made competing claims over the ownership of an invention. ” Chicago Title Ins. Magnuson , 487 F.3d 3d 985, 990 (6 th Cir. Flerick , 521 Fed. 521, 525-26 (6 th Cir.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

at 1-2] At its heart, therefore, this case is a dispute about copyright ownership. But before the ownership dispute could be fully addressed, the court was asked to determine whether the claims were timely; and if so, whether damages could be recovered for conduct occurring more than three years before the lawsuit was filed.

Music 95
article thumbnail

“What’s Mine Is Not Yours To Give Me”—Nor To Take Without Just Compensation: A New Jersey’s Reaction To Sovereign Immunity, Intellectual Property, & Takings

LexBlog IP

Seeing no immediate litigation alternative, I called for “common sense Congressional legislation to make States directly liable for damages for copyright infringement,” because I felt it unfair that, after Allen , copyright owners “would find themselves defenseless from state-sponsored copyright piracy.” Nation Enters.,

article thumbnail

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

LexBlog IP

Further, that same commentator has noted that: In 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted ownership of the word “Jesus” to Jesus Jeans, owned by a publicly traded Italian company, BasicNet, giving the company exclusive rights in America to sell clothing bearing the name “Jesus.” World Intellect.

article thumbnail

WIPIP, Concurrent Session #1, Design

43(B)log

When Design Within Reach started, it said in its 2007 10K: “our competitors believe they have exclusive rights” in some of their proudcts, including some of their best selling items, which were reproductions. There’s not evidence of a litigation history of the few midcentury modern design patents, even though Herman Miller etc.

Designs 57