The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor. The dispute arose between HIP, Inc. (“HIP”)

Inventor 110

Inventor Invention Art Patent 110

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor. The court in Pannu v.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

Patently-O

JANUARY 9, 2024

by Dennis Crouch The text of pre-AIA Section 102(a) suggests that an inventor’s own prior publication qualifies as invalidating prior art, even if within the 1-year grace period. The press release specifically quotes and references Dr. Bill Forbes, who is listed as an inventor on the IBS-D patents. 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(pre-AIA).

Inventor 48

Inventor Art Invention Patent 48

SpicyIP

APRIL 7, 2024

Section 8 and the Transparency of Indian Patent System According to Section 8 of the Indian Patents Act , patent applicants must regularly disclose to the patent office any same or substantially similar foreign applications corresponding to their patent applications for Indian inventions, and any updates relevant to their prosecution.

Patent 72

Patent Patent Application Intellectual Property Law 72

Patently-O

MARCH 18, 2024

The patent at issue, originally naming a single inventor (Steve Campbell), claims a lightweight intermodal container system for transporting refrigerated gaseous fluids. The district court agreed, finding their contributions were significant to the conception of the claimed invention. Tube-Mac Indus., Campbell , No. 2022-2170 (Fed.

Patent 57

Patent Inventor Patent Infringement Designs 57

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2022

Seeing no immediate litigation alternative, I called for “common sense Congressional legislation to make States directly liable for damages for copyright infringement,” because I felt it unfair that, after Allen , copyright owners “would find themselves defenseless from state-sponsored copyright piracy.” 2d 480 (Fed.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Invention Copyright 52