article thumbnail

The Server Test Suffers A Major Blow

Plagiarism Today

In May 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down one of the most important rulings in the history of the internet, the Perfect 10 v Google ruling. The ruling established the “server test,” which allowed sites to embed copyright-protected content without infringement.

article thumbnail

Supreme People’s Court of China issues first comprehensively revised judicial interpretation of anti-unfair competition law since 2007

The IPKat

There was no JI on the AUCL until 2007. JI 2020) was a minor one with only one change to the JI 2007, i.e., replacing one of the legislation’s grounds from the General Principles of the Civil Law to the Civil Code of China (See the IPKat post on the Civil Code of China here ). The subsequent JI (i.e.

Law 95
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Bridging Borders: How Customs Laws Shape Trademark Protection in India

IP and Legal Filings

Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, which empower customs authorities to act against counterfeit goods, are framed under the Customs Act. Under Rule 2007 of IPR Rules, trademarks can be recorded with customs authorities.

article thumbnail

3 Count: Not World Series

Plagiarism Today

He says he originally wanted to take action against the team in 2007 but couldn’t find the painting. However, according to Rodriguez, despite the rejection, the team began to use a logo similar to his work in their promotional material and merchandise. After locating it in 2019, he opted to move ahead.

Reporting 246
article thumbnail

The Riyadh Design Law Treaty: Bringing Design Law into the Future

IP Watchdog

In 2007, I began attending sessions of the World Intellectual Property Organizations (WIPOs) Standing Committee on Trademarks, Industrial Designs, and Geographical Indications (SCT) in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the development of the Design Law Treaty.

Designs 52
article thumbnail

Cranial Technologies Sues Ottobock for Infringement of Cranial Remodeling Patents

JD Supra Law

7,242,798, titled “Automatic Selection of Cranial Remodeling Device Configuration,” which issued in 2007; and U.S. 7,227,979, titled “Automatic Selection of Cranial Remodeling Device Trim Lines,” which issued in 2007. The lawsuit alleges that Ottobock’s MyCRO Band and iFab system infringe U.S. Below is an example. By: Knobbe Martens

article thumbnail

Fraud on the Court: Finality and the Ghost of Hazel-Atlas

Patently-O

In 2007 L&L Wings (owned by respondentsShaul Levy and Meir Levy)sued Marco Destin for trademark infringement in the Southern District of New York. L&L Wings made only the initial $10,000 royalty payment under the agreement, then defaulted on the remaining payments.