Remove 2006 Remove Derivative Work Remove Designs
article thumbnail

The Much-Adapted “Peter Pan” (1904 – Forever )

Velocity of Content

Preface: I wanted to learn more about the concept (and applications) of “derivative works” and adaptations under copyright law, and I was searching for a useful example that might also be interesting for readers of Velocity of Content to read about. All copyrights, except one, expire.*.

article thumbnail

Copyright, AI Training, and LLMs: The Path Forward

Velocity of Content

It is clear that AI is built on a foundation of immense works of authorship, many of which are protected by copyright. 7 When copyrighted works are used, AI systems typically make copies of the works to train and power AI outputs. 1858); Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, c. Ginsburg & R. Dreyfuss eds.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

13 Spooky Copyright Cases, Just in Time for Halloween

Copyright Lately

The humanized skeleton figure on the left is Skully, which artist and entrepreneur Gregory Spiers first conceived while designing a T-shirt for the Lithuanian Olympic basketball team. The humanized skeleton figure on the right is Curly, a character designed for Scholastic’s popular “Goosebumps” series of books.

Copyright 144
article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the “Server Test” for Direct Infringement of the Public Display Right — Hunley v. Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

As a practical matter, the answer is certainly yes; an open system is built into the design of the internet. The problem arises because copyright law is written as an “opt-in” system (no copying without authorization), while the Internet is designed as an “opt-out” system (it allows copying unless it is prohibited).

article thumbnail

CJEU rules that EU Member States cannot set their own reciprocity clauses under the Berne Convention

The IPKat

Turning to the core of the referral – that is any national competence to set reciprocity clauses under Berne – the CJEU noted that: Both ‘work’ and ‘author’ in the InfoSoc Directive are autonomous concepts of EU law, given that no reference is made to national law in either respect.

Art 129
article thumbnail

IPSC: Copyright and Trademark

43(B)log

Significant rise in substantial similarity litigation starting in 2006—tripled. Share of 9 th Circuit opinions also exploded in 2006. Derivative works? RT: maybe design rights are causing the crossover here because they are also accustoming people to think both “everything is an innovation” and “everything is protectable.”