This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This post is based on the chapter “Audiovisual Coverage of Sports Events and CopyrightLaw: Originality in the Details?” Bernt Hugenholtz, Kluwer Law International, 2021. Or that Zinedine Zidane’s Panenka penalty in the 2006 World Cup final does not bear a personal creative stamp? 36, 37).
Welcome to the third trimester of the 2022 round up of EU copyrightlaw! In this series, we update readers every three months on developments in EU copyrightlaw. Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash. You can read the previous round-ups here. European Commission, European Media Freedom Act.
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash Welcome to the second trimester of the 2023 round up of EU copyrightlaw! In this series, every three months we update you on what has happened in EU copyrightlaw. You can read the previous round-ups here. For a blog post detailing the hearing before the court see here.
There is a significant push at this week’s meetings of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on Copyright and RelatedRights to approve a Diplomatic Conference on a Broadcasting Organizations Treaty that is not strictly limited to combating unlawful interception of traditional broadcast signals.
Photographs are included in Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention as copyrightable artistic works. All Berne Union Member States must thus provide copyright protection to photographic works. In fact, Section 72 UrhG basically extends to Lichtbilder the same protection provided to Lichtbildwerke under Section 2(1) UrhG.
A 218/24.11.2022) implemented into the Greek legal order Directives (EU) 790/2019 (hereinafter DSMD) and 789/2019 (as well as Directive 2006/115 on the public lending right, but this is another (lengthy) story…). A major part of the amendments concerns Chapter 4 of Law 2121/1993, which regulates exceptions and limitations to copyright.
Generally, the distinction between collective licensing with extended effect and mandatory collective management of rights is important (see Study on emerging issues on collective licensing practices, p. Where efficient voluntary licensing mechanisms exist, the mandatory collective management of rights ought to be avoided.
Parts 2 to 4 will address exploitation rights, relatedrights, exceptions and limitations, copyright contract law and enforcement. Germany has always had an extensive judicial practice in copyrightlaw. The case law of that copyrightlaw senate of the BGH from 2015 to 2019 is summarised below.
Comment The latest request for the preliminary ruling concerns the knotty question of EU copyrightlaw: whether publishers can be beneficiaries of fair compensation for private copying. 11(4) [use of CMO revenues] and 12(4) [deductions for social, cultural and educational services] Directive 2014/26/EU, as well as Art.
↩︎ See Ginsburg & Ricketson , supra note 49, ¶¶ 11.30 – 11.41 (discussing the rights of reproduction and adaptation in the Convention) [ read full article here ]. ↩︎ See, e.g., German Act on Copyright and RelatedRights (Urheberrechtsgesetz – UrhG), § 3 – Adaptations, Copyright Act of 9 September 1965 (Federal Law Gazette I, p.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content