Remove 2006 Remove Advertising Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions.

article thumbnail

Lower Price Alternative? Comparative Advertising and Trademark Infringement

IPilogue

Comparative advertising is an effective marketing technique, in which a company’s product or service is compared to its competitor’s. Despite these advantages, comparative advertising is a dangerous field to navigate from a legal perspective. In contrast, section 22 is more applicable to trademarks for services.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

UK Court Hands Down Suspended Jail Sentence to eBay Seller of Pirate IPTV Boxes

TorrentFreak

Trading Standards officers bought three devices that worked as advertised. Mr. Al-Saegh was confronted with the evidence at the City of London Magistrates Court this summer, where he pleaded guilty to multiple violations of the Fraud Act 2006. This resulted in a raid on the man’s house where more boxes were found.

article thumbnail

over dissent, 9th Cir. denies injury presumption to false advertising claimant

43(B)log

7, 2021) Quidel appealed the grant of summary judgment to Siemens on Quidel’s Lanham Act false advertising claims and related state claims. Quidel alleged that Siemens advertised (1) but provided (2). And there was no triable issue on actual injury based on allegedly false advertising to the physicians. 388, 391 (2006).” [Not

article thumbnail

Iconic Fansubbing Site Legendas.tv Shuts Down Voluntarily

TorrentFreak

This was also the case with Legendas.tv, a Brazilian fansubbing community founded in 2006. Those were other times, the content was distributed in different ways and, after many years, the market took over with more and more accessible streaming services,” the translated note reads. Legal Issues Came Early. Funds Dried Up.

Cinema 144
article thumbnail

Finding the Real “Burger King”: Identical Marks & Prior Use in the Pune Eatery Case

SpicyIP

The eatery owners argued that they had been using the name Burger King since 1992, which was over two decades before Burger King US entered the Indian market in 2014. to restaurant services only in 2006. It becomes critical to ask whether prior use in the worldwide market suffices in such cases.

article thumbnail

2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. Then, in Liapes v. Musk has bridged that gap. unless you are a Nazi or wannabe.

Law 111