Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 6, 2022

I’ve blogged SO MANY similar cases since 2005 (see the list of posts below). This case involves a 14 year old student HK (and his friends) who, while off-campus, thought it would be funny to create a fake Instagram profile of his biology teacher, Schmidt. The principal immediately suspended HK for 5 days.

Blogging 98

Blogging Publishing Litigation Marketing 98

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 9, 2022

In particular, such a branding plan was not new – in 2005, LeBron James’s agent publicly stated his focus was to make James “the first LeBron James” and not the “second Michael Jordan.”

Contracts 52

Contracts Branding Branding Brands 52

U.S. Department of Commerce

MAY 19, 2022

The paper described how modern communications technologies were creating new needs for cryptography to protect the privacy and security of information on these networks. Chen brought her industrial and academic experience with her when she joined NIST in 2005, and it has equipped her to do her job effectively today.

Technology 62

Technology Art Privacy 62

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 9, 2022

Deepfaking in the metaverse, other than acting as an imputation on a person’s reputation, is also a gross violation of their privacy and personal data. Similarly, in 2005, Japanese police arrested a Chinese exchange student over stealing virtual property in Lineage, an MMORPG game. Conclusion .

Contracts 52

Contracts Law Technology Privacy 52

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 21, 2024

It has been observed that many consumers avoid UPI payments as they are concerned about their privacy and believe that the banks would fail to protect their sensitive data and financial information may be shared with third parties [11]. pdf (2005). [3] 2014), PP 52-61. [2] 2] Reddy, Y. org/review/r050519b. and Dileep G.

Technology 52

Technology Journalism Business Marketing 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

MARCH 11, 2021

10, 2015) (denying motion “to close the courtroom during periods of the trial where trade secret evidence is presented” because the plaintiff’s “privacy interests [could] be adequately protected by sealing the exhibits that are introduced at trial for the duration of the trial”); US Investigations Servs., United Indus., Callihan , No.

Confidentiality 40

Confidentiality Government Intellectual Property Privacy 40

IIPRD

APRIL 28, 2023

5] In order to foster innovation in the nation, this broad protection for IPRs is supported by their legal entitlement to privacy and seclusion. Image Sources : Shutterstock] The Indian courts have further considered the Indian jurisprudence about the relationship between IPR law and competition law in a number of judicial decisions.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor Law Marketing 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

Bill McGeveran: interesting b/c privacy/data protection regimes are very different in the two regimes. There weren’t followup cases from 2005-2017; only six cases cited those two cases and two of those were Oracle v. Saying “this is what people do” compared to “this is the law” is very useful. Was there no overlap at all?

Fair Use 45

Fair Use Contracts Litigation Copying 45

Plagiarism Today

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

Telegram had attempted to argue that such a disclosure would be a violation of privacy laws in Singapore, where their servers are located. The service was founded in 2005 and acquired by Cyando AG in 2012.

Copyright Infringement 246

Copyright Infringement Music Licensing Copyright 246

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

A short-form trademark security agreement which avoids the disclosure of terms of the loan is also recommended while filing documents in the USPTO to protect the privacy of the debtor. The registration at USPTO is required to protect the creditor from bona fide purchasers and mortgages. Patent as Collateral in the US.

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Business Branding 40

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 9, 2023

Supreme Court of India , which dealt with issues of confidentiality, privacy (prior consent) of litigants and witnesses, restrictions on access to proceedings of trials and the preservation of the larger public interest due to the sensitivity of the proceedings. These are based on the principles set forth in Swapnil Tripathi v.

Copyright 136

Copyright Government Law Editing 136

The IPKat

AUGUST 29, 2021

Upon that, The IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post co-authored by Anja Geller (PhD candidate at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) and Zihao Li (PhD candidate at CREATe, University of Glasgow, on privacy and data protection in the Chinese Civil Code).

Law 97

Law Art Privacy Government 97

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

Union of India [1] , established that privacy is an essential Fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Unauthorised use of someone’s identity is a violation of both their personality rights and their basic right to privacy. The Court rejected the privacy defence, which is often employed in IP proceedings.

Personality Rights 92

Personality Rights Privacy Social Media Intellectual Property 92

IP Whiteboard

APRIL 15, 2021

The Duchess of Sussex) was recently granted summary judgment in a privacy claim against Associated Newspapers Limited, over the publication of extracts from a hand-written letter to her father (see HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch) ). Background. The Duke of Sussex, a.k.a.

Privacy 40

Privacy Copyright Publishing Law 40

The IPKat

AUGUST 2, 2023

There is a 5-year statute of limitations under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act and had Alcoa been concerned about UAC they should have brought their claims in 2005. UAC also argued that Alcoa was time-barred.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Litigation Privacy Technology 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 18, 2024

In particular, age authentication mandates are riddled with unavoidable privacy and security concerns; they also make it harder to navigate the Internet and create an authentication infrastructure that censors and authoritarians will find easy to weaponize in the future.

Law 111

Law Social Media Advertising Advertising 111

SpicyIP

JUNE 13, 2022

Change in titles su ggests a shift in focus – from protection of privacy to regulation of data as an asset. This is line with the requirements under the Right to Information Act, 2005 which requires the State to act transparently.

Confidentiality 129

Confidentiality Technology Government Ownership 129

Likelihood of Confusion

FEBRUARY 17, 2025

Originally posted 2005-01-11 15:02:00.

Privacy 52

Privacy Blogging Law 52

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Right To Publicity- A Constitutional Right The right of publicity stems from the right of privacy. But right to privacy only came to be recognised as a fundamental right in the year 2017 in the case of Justice K.S. 2006 QB 125 : (2005) 3 WLR 881 : 2005 EWCA Civ 595. Publicity Rights and the Right to Privacy in India, 31.1

Privacy 105

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 105

Michael Geist

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

I appeared before the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs yesterday to discuss the bill, warning that face recognition technologies raise serious privacy risks and that website blocking would have negative consequences for freedom of expression. Further, I emphasized how incredibly broadly the bill is drafted.

Privacy 103

Privacy Technology Government Law 103

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 7, 2024

On the other hand, the right to informational privacy is a fundamental right that is routinely used by the State to bypass the right to information (‘RTI’). The argument is that the Right to Information (RTI) and the Right to Privacy (RTP) are not conflicting but complementary. This presents a practical challenge.

Privacy 96

Privacy Government Contracts Copying 96

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 24, 2025

.” [For more on the crisis of online contracts, see this short piece.] __ “I analyze everything you post and often apply those insights to my workespecially topics like Section 230 of the CDA, privacy issues, and e-commerce.” ” A prediction from 2005 that didn’t quite come true LOL. ” The DC v.

Blogging 52

Blogging Privacy Social Media Law 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 27, 2022

Apple positions itself as more privacy-supportive than the other tech giants, but then it committed an unforgiveable privacy faux pas by unveiling plans to proactively scan client-side files for illegal CSAM. California voters passed a terrible privacy law in November 2020. Apple’s Client-Side Scanning Plans. issue 2, Nov.

Social Media 145

Social Media Law Privacy Government 145

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 24, 2023

It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) Moody, amicus brief in support of the petition for certiorari , November 2022 Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, California Privacy Protection Agency, August 2022 NetChoice LLC v.

Law 122

Law Social Media Government Privacy 122

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 9, 2025

Privacy Lawyers May Be Why We Can’t Have Nice Things. If you’re a privacy hammer, everything looks like a privacy nail.

Social Media 102

Social Media Law Government Privacy 102