Remove 2005 Remove IP Remove Patent Application
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Mays” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) 

SpicyIP

We aimed to explore SpicyIP’s history, which began in October 2005, ‘from the sprawling cornfields of Illinois, Champaign,’ by our beloved Professor Shamnad Basheer. Without further ado, here’s what I found in the pages of “Mays” on SpicyIP: IP and CSIR: Prashant Reddy, renowned for his incisive RTI-based posts (e.g.

article thumbnail

…And The Covaxin Patent Saga Continues: BBIL Changes the Patent Application Again

SpicyIP

The Story Till Now On one hand, COVID-19 cases are rising yet again to everyone’s surprise, and on the other, the surprises from the Covaxin patent application don’t seem to stop. Two revisions in the patent applications have occurred since then, and this post analyses the events and their implications on the Covaxin patent.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Julys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Kurian’s trail of transparency, discussions about authors and copyright societies, updates on the international IP landscape, or the hustle and bustle of the domestic IP domain, including Statements of Patent (Non-)Working, the journey through Junes had its own jilts and joys.

article thumbnail

Divided PTAB Sinks Wildseed Mobile IP In Wins For Google

IP Law 360

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has issued a pair of rulings wiping out claims in two patents asserted by a litigation outfit targeting the way that ads work on YouTube, but the decisions included a rare dissent-in-part from an administrative judge who disagreed on how a 2005 Sony patent application fit into the dispute.

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Septembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Yes … the current level of accessibility wasn’t always the case in the IP domain neither in trademark nor in patent domain! Patent Opposition: Navigating SpicyIP’s September pages, I chanced upon a 2009 piece from Prof. As the research revealed, the majority of these oppositions relied on Section 3(d).

article thumbnail

Tips From a Former Examiner: Pre-Appeal Brief Review

IP Watchdog

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) office actions on the merits, a patent applicant has the option to appeal the patent examiner’s decision rejecting one or more claims to a higher forum, i.e., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). After two or more U.S.

article thumbnail

The Curious Question of Who Is An “Any Person” Part 1: BHC and Diluting of Pre-Grant Oppositions

SpicyIP

A recent order by the Delhi High Court in the case of Agriboard International Llc vs Deputy Controller Of Patents brought up the very relevant issue of the requirement of the Patent office to issue “speaking orders” while rejecting a patent application. Widened Locus Standi. Cipla Ltd & Ors.