Remove 2005 Remove Invention Remove Patent Remove Patent Infringement
article thumbnail

COVID-19 Vaccine Patent Infringement? The Battle Between Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech Continues

SpicyIP

COVID-19 Vaccine Patent Infringement? The Battle Between Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech Continues Last month, the patent battle between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine manufacturers continued with BioNTech/Pfizer filing a strong defense and counter-claim to Moderna’s allegations of patent infringement. Patent no. ’127

article thumbnail

Claim Construction Order Sets Stage for Moderna v. Pfizer Vaccine Patent Showdown

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Moderna filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Pfizer and BioNTech in August 2022, alleging that the defendants COVID-19 vaccine infringes three patents related to Moderna’s mRNA vaccine technology. United States Patent Nos. 10,898,574, 10,702,600, and 10,933,127.

Patent 97
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Some Concerns about the Amendment Process to Key Patent Levers: A “Captured” Patent Office?

SpicyIP

In light of the recent Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024, we are pleased to bring this post by Prashant Reddy T., Image from here A ‘Captured’ Patent Office? Two of the provisions slated to be amended have a direct impact on the quality of patents granted by the Patent Office. Prashant Reddy T.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law: November 2023

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Debates Scope of 271(e)(1) Safe Harbor and the Meaning of “Solely”

Patently-O

highlights tensions in the court’s interpretation of the patent infringement safe harbor under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) provides an exemption from patent infringement liability for certain activities related to seeking regulatory approval of drugs and medical devices. 193 (2005). Meril Life Sciences Pvt.

article thumbnail

Covenant to not sue “at any time” terminated with the license agreement

Patently-O

Background In 2005, AlexSam licensed its prepaid card patents to MasterCard in exchange for ongoing royalties based on the number of “Licensed Transactions.” And, even though the subject matter of the lawsuit is a patent license, that sort of case is ordinarily not seen as “arising under” the U.S.

article thumbnail

Biogen Seeks a Preliminary Injunction in Natalizumab BPCIA Case Against Sandoz

LexBlog IP

The joint proposal also requires that Biogen elect, by November 18, 2022, up to 5 patents and up to 10 claims to be asserted as part of the preliminary injunction. Biogen alleges infringement of twenty-eight patents under the BPCIA based on Sandoz’s submission of an aBLA for PB006, a proposed biosimilar of TYSABRI (natilizumab).