Remove 2005 Remove Invention Remove Patent
article thumbnail

Cross-Border Inventing

Patently-O

The chart below highlights an important trend in patenting: increased joint-inventorship where the inventors reside in different countries. The top (blue-circle) series looks generally at cross-border joint-inventing while the lower (orange-square) series reports a subset where at least one of the inventors has a US residence.

article thumbnail

Journey Through “Augusts” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Whether it is South Asian Basmati Brawls, the much-to-tread trail of transparency, the Statements of Patent (Non-)Working, or the Indian “Bayh Dole” Bill, some stories never cease to beguile us. Relevantly, Victor Vaibhav touches upon several related questions when he asks ‘What ails Indian universities when it comes to patenting?’

IP 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

[GuestPost] 59% of IPKat readers say its time to overhaul patent exclusions

The IPKat

, the IPKat published a post by KatFriend, Peter Arrowsmith ( GJE ) on the Court of Appeal's decision in Emotional Perception , together with a poll asking if it was time for an overhaul of the exclusions to patent protection. The list of non-inventions in Art. 52(2) EPC is now more than 50 years old.

Patent 100
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Swearing Behind a Prior Art Reference

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Patent 7,736,355 (“the ’355 patent”) does not qualify as prior art to related U.S. Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379 (collectively, “the challenged patents”) under pre-AIA’s first-to-invent provisions. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L. ,

Art 147
article thumbnail

Challenges of Proving Inventorship: Corroboration of All Inventive Facts

Patently-O

2023) The case involving Medtronic and Teleflex centered on five patents related to a coaxial guide catheter used in interventional cardiology procedures. In an attempt to invalidate these patents, Medtronic launched a succession of Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions. Patent 7,736,355 (“Itou”) could be regarded as prior art.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent

Patently-O

A world first – South Africa recently made headlines by granting a patent for ‘a food container based on fractal geometry’ to a non-human inventor, namely an artificial intelligence (AI) machine called DABUS. Each of these three jurisdictions found sufficient reasons in these formalities to reject DABUS’ patent applications.

Invention 128
article thumbnail

When can/not a Patent Application be Divided? Part II: Claims & Pluralities

SpicyIP

This second part continues where that post left off, and brings us analysis on whether or not, for the purposes of maintaining a divisional application, there must be a plurality of inventions in the claims of the parent application. When can/not a Patent Application be Divided? Part II: Claims & Pluralities. Author: Amit Tailor.