SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

SpicyIP Tidbit: Some Strengthening of the Right to Information Act, 2005 From the Judicial Side Image from here RTI applications are often responded to with dodgy replies and incorrect information. Md Sabeeh Ahmad writes on the proposed changes to the timelines in the patent prosecution process.

Cease and Desist 105

Cease and Desist Patent Prosecution Trademark Derivative Work 105

The IPKat

AUGUST 2, 2023

Those who needed to know then had to sign a separate confidentiality agreement. There is a 5-year statute of limitations under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act and had Alcoa been concerned about UAC they should have brought their claims in 2005.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Litigation Privacy Technology 52

Trading Secrets

JULY 12, 2022

The motion judge denied the injunction, holding that any protectable interests regarding Excel’s brand partners could be protected by more narrow non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions. 2005); See also Arthur J. It is also noteworthy that Klutch was specifically identified as a competitor in Eways’s non-compete. 1] [link]. [2]

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Branding Brands Branding 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 29, 2022

1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. OxBlue. * Want To Know Amazon’s Confidential Settlement Terms For A Keyword Advertising Lawsuit? 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. WhenU (2d Cir.

Trademark 111

Trademark Advertising Advertising Blogging 111

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

MARCH 11, 2021

The Eastern District of Texas General Order “anticipates that HSDs may also include documents that, in the judgment of the filing party, are or contain HSI that is substantially likely to adversely affect,” inter alia , “nonpublic intellectual property, trade secrets, or highly confidential commercial information.” 2d 421, 423–24 (S.D.N.Y.

Confidentiality 40

Confidentiality Government Intellectual Property Privacy 40

The IPKat

AUGUST 29, 2021

In 2005, scholars proposed an Expert Draft. Notification of individuals is necessary unless it interferes with the performance of their statutory obligations or when there is a specific statutory rule requiring confidentiality. It is the culmination of a long process.

Law 97

Law Art Privacy Government 97

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

” As recognized in Wellspan, this type of interest includes showing that a non-competition provision is necessary to protect such things as trade secrets and confidential information, unique or extraordinary skills, customer goodwill, patient relationships, patient referral bases, and investments in an employee’s specialized training.

Blogging 52

Blogging Confidentiality Business Editing 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 17, 2021

It also noted that the public statements of Archer’s senior officers were ambiguous and not necessarily conclusive that confidential information of Wisk Aero’s was brought by and used by its engineers when they joined Archer and developed its air taxi. As the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit explained in Stratienko v. Cordis Corp.,

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Invention Technology Patent Application 52

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Journey Through “Octobers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) The October “Flashbacks” are here! Lokesh covers another super interesting round of discussions stemming from SpicyIP’s Octobers (2005-present)! Read Yogesh’s take on this to know more. Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson vs Intex Technologies (India) Ltd.

IP 59

IP Trademark Copyright Registration 59

SpicyIP

MARCH 4, 2024

Other Posts Journey Through “Januarys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) Image from here Sit back, relax, and sift through the pages of January’s posts on SpicyIP! Read Tejaswini’s post to know more about the decision and how it fares with the MHC order on Section 3(i) in the Chinese University of Hong Kong case.

Invention 59

Invention Trademark IP Patent 59

SpicyIP

MARCH 21, 2024

Between 1911 and 2005, Indian patent law allowed any person to “oppose” a patent application within a three-months window, after the patent application had been examined and found fit to be granted but before the patent was “sealed.” That the requirement to disclose this information annually is burdensome is quite simply not true.

Patent 52

Patent Patent Application Government Reporting 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 19, 2021

After the Patent Amendment Act 2005, patent protection for food, pharma and chemical inventions is possible but this concept not very popular in India. A trade secret is any confidential information which confers economic benefit and a competitive edge to the holder. The answer is yes.

Patent 40

Patent Invention Public Domain Patent Application 40

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 23, 2023

The first was a case where Petronet tried using the law on confidentiality to gag reportage and the second was a case where the Tata group in an uncharacteristic lapse of judgement tried using trademark law to shut down a website setup by Greenpeace.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Law IP 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

A: contracts were confidential but may be able to talk about standard terms. There weren’t followup cases from 2005-2017; only six cases cited those two cases and two of those were Oracle v. A: Interview basis made time hard to account for, but some lawyers did mention that things have changed a lot since the 1980s. Accolade, Sony v.

Fair Use 45

Fair Use Contracts Litigation Copying 45

43(B)log

JUNE 16, 2022

The information contained in this document is confidential to the person to whom it is addressed. New clients received a welcome letter stating: Since 2005, The Newton Group ESA and Newton Group Transfers have assisted in successfully helping thousands of timeshare owners end their timeshare contractual obligations.

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Contracts 45

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 24, 2023

Other Posts Journey Through “Novembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) Sift through the pages of November(s) posts on SpicyIP in another round of SpicyIP flashbacks by Lokesh. The Court observed that there is a need to balance the necessity of granting the interim relief with the principles governing non-compete clauses.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Copyright Registering Trademarks 52

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 9, 2023

Supreme Court of India , which dealt with issues of confidentiality, privacy (prior consent) of litigants and witnesses, restrictions on access to proceedings of trials and the preservation of the larger public interest due to the sensitivity of the proceedings. These are based on the principles set forth in Swapnil Tripathi v.

Copyright 136

Copyright Government Law Editing 136

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 2, 2022

Honest Abe has been installing, repairing, and maintaining residential roofs since 2005. (“Honest Abe”), is an Indiana Corporation with its principal place of business in Terre Haute, Indiana. They have numerous locations in multiple states. 1117 , costs, investigatory fees, and expenses.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Designs Design Business 52

IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

INTRODUCTION Privileged communication refers to the confidential exchange of words between clients and their attorneys. The IP Committee of the Law Council of Australia in 2005 called for protection for foreign agents, [15] which was realised via the IP Laws Amendment Act, 2012 [16].

Law 52

Law Trademark IP Patent 52

IP Whiteboard

APRIL 15, 2021

The contents of the Letter were not private or confidential, and there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. Ltd (No 3) [2005] 4 All ER 128 , which concerned unauthorised photographs which were taken of Michael Douglas’ wedding to Catherine Zeta-Jones. [33] The defendant raised a number of arguments, including that: [19].

Privacy 40

Privacy Copyright Publishing Law 40

SpicyIP

JUNE 13, 2022

This is line with the requirements under the Right to Information Act, 2005 which requires the State to act transparently. As seen in the past, the Delhi Police refused to share information about its the facial recognition technology citing a trade secrecy exemption under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Confidentiality 129

Confidentiality Technology Government Ownership 129