Remove 2003 Remove Registering Trademarks Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Protection of Color Trademarks under the Indian Trademark Law

Kashishipr

Under Section 2(1)(zb) of the Act, any word, label, name, device, brand, ticket, signature, heading, letter, numeral, the shape of products, packaging, the combination of colors, or any combination thereof can be registered as a trademark if the same fulfills the criteria of distinctiveness and graphical representation. Final Thoughts.

article thumbnail

Customs Intervention for IP in the Indian Sub-Continent

Kashishipr

A Unique Temporary Registration Number (UTRN) is generated on filing the online application. After approval of the application for recordation by the Commissioner of Customs, the UTRN will be converted to UPRN (Unique Permanent Registration Number), and the said UPRN would be issued, which confirms the recordation.

IP 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Governance and Supervision of Trademark and Patent Agents: Discussing DHC’s Saurav Chaudhary vs. Union Of India

SpicyIP

If so, what will be the liability of such agents – damages, suspension, or cancellation of registration? Section 130 and Rule 116 empower the Controller to remove the name of a patent agent from the register if s/he is found to be guilty of professional misconduct. Though his registration was later restored.

article thumbnail

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN THAILAND

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

The Trademark Act B.E 2534, governs the trademark procedure, even though Trademark registration is not mandatory in Thailand. However, if one wishes to own their mark exclusively and prevent their competitors from using it, they must register their trademark with the Thai Trademark Registrar.

article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement Get So “Lucky”

IP and Legal Filings

The Respondent secured federal trademark registration for “Get Lucky” in 1986, and the Petitioner commenced offering garments employing the registered trademark “Lucky Brand” and term “Lucky” a few years later, in 1990. This case saw the issuance of several marks.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (August 7- August 13)

SpicyIP

In an incisive post, Mathews argues that the DHC’s ruling is too broad and ignores the cutoff date (in 2003 – 13 years prior to the amendment of the Rules) for placing the reservation within the country’s Patent Rules. The defendant had filed another application seeking deletion of plaintiff no. Case: Paul Components Pvt.

article thumbnail

Fraudulent Incontestability Declarations: Textual Fidelity vs. Fraud Deterrence

Patently-O

18, 2023) , the Federal Circuit addressed whether fraud in a declaration of incontestability justifies cancelling the underlying trademark registration. Their disagreement centers on the scope of “maintaining” a registration and policy concerns over deterring false statements. I’m sure they are lovely.