2003 Licensing Ownership 
IP and Legal Filings
JULY 24, 2023
Introduction Shutterstock is a global provider of licensed images, videos, audio and editing tools, that has revolutionized the way visual content can be accessed and used. Content creators contribute their work to the platform, making it available for licensing, while end users can easily browse, license and utilize them.
The IP Law Blog
APRIL 30, 2021
Although Kobe started his career with Adidas, he changed to Nike in 2003, and he stayed there for the rest of his life. Of course, you could also speculate that the Bryant Estate is simply protecting its rights in these marks and that it will later license the rights to another company like Nike or Adidas. My bet is on the former.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
MAY 2, 2022
The proposal expressly stated that “ownership and title to the Equipment” would be conveyed. ” An offer to license is distinct from an offer to sell. .” ” An offer to license is distinct from an offer to sell. Hallmark Cards, Inc. , 3d 1041, 1053 (Fed.Cir.2001) 2001) (Judge Lourie Concurring).
Patently-O
APRIL 10, 2022
In spite of its ownership of the patents, however, a jury found that a predecessor of BioVeris (IGEN) had exclusively licensed the patents to Meso Scale Diagnostics, and that Roche was liable to Meso for directly infringing one of the patents, and for inducing infringement of two others. Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Kogyo Co. ,
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
For instance, the International Trade Commission already requires some disclosure of complainants that seek its exclusive jurisdiction over nationwide injunctions, both as to NPE status and to licensing and industry activity to establish the statutory domestic industry requirement. 2d 217, 221 (Ohio 2003). 8, 2022). [30]
Patently-O
JULY 16, 2024
by Dennis Crouch In Backertop Licensing LLC v. District Court for Delaware uncovered a scheme involving shell companies like Nimitz Technologies, Mellaconic IP, and Lamplight Licensing. 2003) (witness testimony important). Canary Connect, Inc. , Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly of the U.S. LaPray and Backertop’s counsel.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 2, 2022
The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. It’s sooooooo 2003. Irreparable Harm / Balance of Equities : The court confirms that no viable alternative data sources exist for hiQ.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content