SpicyIP

JULY 8, 2021

Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) is the statutory university established by the Government of Gujarat under the Gujarat National Law University Act, 2003. A writing sample either published or unpublished on Intellectual Property Law (between 1000-1500 words including footnotes). About the University.

Law 105

Law Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law IP 105

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 11, 2023

9 Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 47 (2018), As cited in Mohit Joshi, Smell Marks: A New Era, 3(3) ILJMH (2020). NLSI Rev 67, 73 (2010) ; Harsh Pati Tripathi, Potentiality of ‘Smell’ as a Trademark and its limitations, IP Law India (July 31st, 9:11 pm) [link] [10] EUTMIR, Arts 3(3), 3(4). 2010) 14 SCC 285.

Trademark 98

Trademark Registration Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 98

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” The report notes on page 11 that “In 2003, research estimates put the [U.S.] ” Ginsburg (2003) at 1086-87.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 26, 2023

2003) 27 PTC 478 at para 63. See also: Libertel Group BV and Benelux-Merkenbureau [2003] E.T.M.R. 15] Sieckmann (C-273/00) EU:C:2002:748 [2003] Ch 487 [16] Vatsala, Supra note 2, at page 129. [17] 15] Sieckmann (C-273/00) EU:C:2002:748 [2003] Ch 487 [16] Vatsala, Supra note 2, at page 129. [17] 2003) 27 PTC 478. [19]

Registration 98

Registration Trademark Trademark Law Law 98

LexBlog IP

JULY 6, 2021

However, from 2003 to 2019 , the average number of SPAC IPOs per year was just 23, and SPAC IPOs have never raised more than 20% of total U.S. After graduation, he intends to practice business or intellectual property law. The Year of SPAC. IPOs and 46% of total U.S. IPO proceeds. IPO proceeds in a given year.

Intellectual Property Law 98

Intellectual Property Law Marketing Marketing Intellectual Property 98

SpicyIP

JANUARY 20, 2024

From one of the recommendations of this meeting emerged the “International Association for the Advancement of Teaching and Research in Intellectual Property” aka ATRIP in 1981. In this symposium, Professors Narmada Khodie (then Head, Department of Law, University of Bombay, India) and K. William Cornish (UK), and Prof.

Government 112

Government IP Intellectual Property Reporting 112

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 21, 2023

149, 159 (2003), the exceptions in 35 U.S.C. § Peabody Coal Co. , 326(a)(11) for “good cause” and “joinder” do not strip the PTAB of authority to issue a Final Written Decision after the deadline passed; and the mandate that the PTAB issue a Final Written Decision prescribed 35 U.S.C. §

Litigation 147

Litigation Patent Art Designs 147

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 17, 2024

Abstract In the changing landscape of intellectual property law, Trademarks have gone beyond the traditionally used symbols, names, logos to enhance the non-traditional identifiers. 2003), acknowledged that a combination of colours and function as a great mark if it develops distinctiveness through consistent use over time. [3]

Trademark 52

Trademark Branding Branding Brands 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JULY 31, 2023

but rather a property necessarily present’.” The Federal Circuit states a limitation is inherent if it is the “natural result flowing from” the prior art’s explicit disclosure. Schering Corp. Geneva Pharms., 3d 1373, 1379 (Fed.

Art 130

Art Invention Patent 130

Kashishipr

DECEMBER 28, 2021

Three pharmaceutical companies, including Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Micromet AG, and Cambridge Antibody Technology (now acquired by AstraZeneca), in September 2003 announced signing a non-exclusive cross-license agreement. It also allowed them to research well and come up with therapeutic and diagnostic antibody-based products.

IP 105

IP Patent Invention Licensing 105

Kashishipr

MAY 11, 2022

2003 (27) PTC 478 Del. The post Protection of Color Trademarks under the Indian Trademark Law appeared first on Blog | Kashish IPR | Intellectual Property Rights Law Firm. Colgate Palmolive Company vs. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. For more visit: [link].

Trademark Law 105

Trademark Law Trademark Law Branding 105

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 21, 2022

4, 2003, but in late 2021, the Xerox Corporation sold their patent rights to Bassfield. If you have any questions about this patent matter or any other intellectual property law matter, please reach out to Jim Muraff at jmuraff@mcdonaldhopkins.com. Although the ‘053 patent expires on Oct.

Patent 52

Patent Advertising Advertising Intellectual Property Law 52

Kashishipr

AUGUST 2, 2021

Thus, the IP rights holders must monitor and take suitable and timely action against the imports that can possibly be infringing on their Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs). . The database from the Intellectual Property Office is automatically shared with the Customs, which then keeps track of the infringing imports.

IP 105

IP Intellectual Property Registration Registering Trademarks 105

IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

1] The Indian Law recognises this attorney-client privilege from Sections 132 to 134 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.[2] 2] However, such privilege has not been granted to patent or trademark agents in the Indian regime, which can otherwise play a vital role in the emerging domain of the Intellectual Property regime.

Law 52

Law Trademark IP Patent 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

magna cum laude , from George Mason University School of Law in 2014 and his B.S., Dr. Caleb Bates focuses his practice on intellectual property law, with an emphasis on patent prosecution, strategic counseling, and worldwide patent portfolio management in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields. He received his J.D.,

Due Diligence 59

Due Diligence Patent Prosecution Litigation Intellectual Property 59

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

David Vaver is the Acting Director of IP Osgoode and a Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Osgoode Hall Law School. The following is a preview of a paper to be published in the Intellectual Property Journal. . 2 of the Copyright Act RSC 1985, c. 53(2); Circle Film, at 606-7).

Ownership 92

Ownership Copyright Intellectual Property Designs 92

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

However, it was his time at the University of Chicago Law School, where he earned his Juris Doctorate in 1962, that truly shaped his trajectory towards judicial excellence. Serving as Chief Judge from 1997 to 2003, he embodied integrity and wisdom, earning respect and admiration from his peers and the community alike.

Law 52

Law 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MAY 16, 2023

Wildeman is a 2003 graduate of Indiana University , Bloomington, Indiana, where she received Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Arts degrees after double majoring in Psychology and Criminal Justice with a minor in Biology. The District Judges of the court interviewed the finalists and selected Ms. Born in Evansville, Indiana, Ms.

Journalism 52

Journalism Art Licensing Law 52

IIPRD

OCTOBER 28, 2023

Hence, complying with the set stance, for a celebrity catchphrase to be intellectually protected in India, it ought to show its distinctive nature, goodwill, and market reputation. Conclusion Indian intellectual property laws and judiciary’s position on the trademark of celebrity catchphrases is a bit shaky.

Copyright Law 59

Copyright Law Branding Branding Brands 59

IIPRD

JANUARY 29, 2023

1] However, this growth also brought an onslaught of new Intellectual Property (IP) issues. Lipton, ‘An Introduction to Smart Contracts and Their Potential and Inherent Limitations’ ( Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance , 26 May 2018) <[link] accessed 11 October 2022. [7] 2d 119 (2d Cir. 2d 945 (9 th Cir.

IP 52

IP Artwork Contracts Intellectual Property 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 18, 2021

Because several of the getGo® Marks have been in use continuously since at least 2003, and Plaintiffs apparently complied with all further requirements, they are incontestable under 15 U.S.C. Get To Know GetGo. Further, Giant Eagle claims it has spent millions of dollars to advertise and promote its services using the getGo® Marks.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Service Mark Advertising 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

Brazilian Law Review of Civil Law – RBDCivil, v. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press , 2003, p. 37, 2018). [3] 3] LANDES, William M. and POSNER, Richard A. 4 [4] ASCENSÂO, José de Oliveira. O fair use no direito autoral.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 26, 2023

Bharathwaj is a student at the Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur and loves reading books and IP law. Highlighting this contradiction within the judgement, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Bharathwaj Ramakrishnan. Image from here Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC V.

Technology 59

Technology Licensing Design Designs 59

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 2, 2022

However, in 2012 an investigation revealed international banks had been manipulating LIBOR for profit, dating back to 2003. Established in 1984, LIBOR was a daily calculated and globally accepted benchmark interest rate. Due to the erosion of public trust, LIBOR experienced a decline in its trust as a household benchmark interest rate.

Publishing 52

Publishing Reporting Law Contracts 52

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 26, 2024

are all part of their personality rights, which are protected under intellectual property rights. These rights derive their power from the idea of privacy as enumerated and protected by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and are accordingly preserved under IPR laws in India. to be protected to avoid exploitation. Rajagopal v.

Personality Rights 52

Personality Rights Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

In 1990, Dr Llewelyn was appointed to a lectureship at the University of Central Lancashire, at Preston, which was followed in 1993 by a move to the University of Sheffield, initially as a ‘Common Law Institute for Intellectual Property (CLIP) Lecturer in Intellectual Property.’

Intellectual Property 81

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law IP Law 81

Kashishipr

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

In 2003, the photocopier firm Xerox came up with an advertisement that read, “When you use ‘Xerox’ the way you use ‘aspirin,’ we get a headache.” The post Saving your Mark from Trademark Genericide appeared first on Blog | Kashish IPR | Intellectual Property Rights Law Firm.

Trademark 105

Trademark Brands Branding Branding 105

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 19, 2025

Where the offending brand does not directly breach intellectual property rights of the rightful but they create a sense of ambiguity by exploiting the events visibility and media coverage to gain commercial benefits. The Legal Gray Area: Does IP Law Fully Protect Against Ambush Marketing? Arvee Enterprises and Ors.

Intellectual Property 96

Intellectual Property Marketing Marketing Branding 96

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Arvee Enterprises in 2003. Emerging Trends in Publicity Rights in India : An Analysis Under the Intellectual Property Laws in India, 2 CMET (2015) 74 Zacchini v. For the first time, publicity rights were expressly dealt with as a facet of privacy rights in the case of ICC Development (International) v.

Privacy 105

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 105