2003 Artistic Work Copyright Law 
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 12, 2023
In relation to ‘Parodies’, since it is derived from the original work of another writer or artist, it is difficult to draw a line between creative criticism and imitation. 2003 (27) PTC 457 (Bom) (DB). Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Parody under the Copyright Law first appeared on IPLF.
IP and Legal Filings
JULY 13, 2022
However, even then, the degree of novelty required in work was not so low as to allow everyone to get copyright protection for their artistic work. However, in 2003, with the case of Eastern Book Company v. Copyright Act or Design Act? In the case of Indian Express Newspaper (Bombay) Pvt Ltd v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IPilogue
FEBRUARY 4, 2022
It is important to note that copyright law does not protect the idea behind the work, but the expression of work. The fact that a latter work bears some similarity to an existing work does not, on its own, amount to infringement of the reproduction right. In Okilo v Dick Francis and Anor (2003-2007) 5 I.P.L.R
IIPRD
OCTOBER 28, 2023
Catchphrases in Copyright and Trademark Law Copyright law guarantees artists the protection of their creative work while allowing others to expand upon it through its legislations. are generally not protected by copyright law. Additionally, names, titles, phrases, combinations, slogans, etc.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
Goldsmith et al sheds light on different perspectives of copyright law in common law and civil law countries. This brief post dives into this duality, as exampled by American and Brazilian law. Firstly, both Brazilian and American legislation stipulate that the creator of a work holds copyright over it.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
6] The Supreme Court’s ruling on that petition—and a possible eventual decision on the merits—could have enormous implications for the art world and other industries impacted by copyright law. Originals” [7] : The Works at Issue. 24] Prince. N*E*W* S [Album]. NPG Records. [25] 21-869 (Dec. 9, 2021) at i. [26] 26] 510 U.S.
IIPRD
AUGUST 11, 2023
This makes it difficult for the creator to control the dissemination of their works. According to the well-settled laws of copyright, it is a blatant mutilation of the rights of an author over their works and the characters they have developed. Napster, Inc., 3d 1004, 1021, 1022 (2001). [3] 4] Star India v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content