SpicyIP

JULY 10, 2023

The 2017 rules make it directory and 2002 rules make it mandatory. Thus, the question arises here as to whether the 2002 Rules continue to apply in these matters despite the saving provision of Rule 158 in 2017 Rules. Loss to Apple in London SEP appeal against Optis for 4G patent infringement.

Registration 98

Registration Copyright Infringement Trademark Copyright 98

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

on 9 February, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The key issue was whether the time limit for filing evidence in Opposition proceedings before the Trade Marks Registry, specifically the “two plus one month” aggregate three months’ period under the 2002 Rules, is mandatory or merely a guideline. . & Anr.

Invention 105

Invention Music Art Patent Application 105

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 2, 2024

Salus Pharmaceuticals And Another on 27 November 2024 (Himachal Pradesh HC) The suit was filed by the plaintiff for an ex parte ad interim injunction against the defendant alleging patent infringement.

Invention 52

Invention Trademark Reporting Editing 52

IIPRD

JUNE 24, 2024

7] WIPO Treaties ‘The WIPO Copyright Treaty’ and the “WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty” became effective in 2002, [8] marking a notable milestone in enhancing copyright and related rights protection globally, showcasing substantial advancements and international collaboration. 8 (1994): 2621–29. [8] 9] “WIPO Copyright Treaty, Dec.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Artistic Work Registration Copyright 52

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 8, 2022

The crux of the decision is as follows: [T]he district court read our precedent as applying a bright-line rule that patent infringement notice letters and related communications can never form the basis for personal jurisdiction. 2002); Red Wing Shoe Co., … [T]he district court erred in this regard. 3d 1356, 1364 (Fed.

Law 53

Law Patent Law Licensing Government 53

Patently-O

OCTOBER 5, 2022

Eli Lilly and Novartis are in the midst of complex European patent and competition (antitrust) litigation regarding their competing monoclonal antibody drugs used to treat autoimmune symptoms such as psoriasis and arthritis. In each of these cases, Novartis is the plaintiff asserting patent infringement. 3d 1343 (Fed.

Litigation 61

Litigation Patent Licensing Business 61

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

12, 16 (2002), and expanded upon in Gonzales v. 23-491 This case arises from multiple patent infringement lawsuits filed by Realtime Data LLC (d/b/a IXO) against various technology companies, including Fortinet, Inc., MacNeil contends doing so violates the Supreme Court’s “ordinary remand rule” established in I.N.S. 183 (2006).

Patent Law 75

Patent Law Law Patent Art 75

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

In 2002, another office action characterized PMC’s arguments and submissions as “straw men,” “lame,”” “repugnant,” “NONSENSE,” “mystifying,” “careless,” “an unnecessary drain on already limited PTO resources,” “contorted,” and “reading like the directions to a treasure hunt.” The ’091 Patent is one of them. 3d at 1359-60.

Litigation 52

Litigation Patent Patent Application Technology 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 29, 2024

Breadth of the Covenant : The Federal Circuit held that the plain language of the covenant not to sue in the License Agreement between AlexSam and MasterCard was extremely broad, covering not just potential patent infringement suits but also AlexSam’s breach of contract suit to recover unpaid royalties under the Agreement.

Licensing 52

Licensing Contracts Patent Law Patent 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Ericsson filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court, challenging the CCI’s decision claiming that the patent infringement is covered under the Patent Act of 2002, and hence the Competition Act has nothing to do with the present matter.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Government Inventor 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002. General Motors pledged its “Green Technology” patents for a period of 2 years when it faced bankruptcy in 2009.

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Business Branding 40

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 6, 2023

Delhi High Court Directs Maharaja to Pay a King’s Ransom in a Patent Infringement Suit In a rare sighting, the Delhi High Court calculated notional damages in a patent dispute on a “reasonable royalty basis” and directed Maharaja Appliances Ltd. to pay upwards of 81 Lakhs to Strix Ltd.

Licensing 59

Licensing IP Patent Infringement Confidentiality 59