SpicyIP

MAY 23, 2022

Jithendra Prasad Singh v State of Assam, 2002. Without the registration requirement, there is no need of any documentation to even claim ownership, before pointing at someone else for alleged infringement and opening them up to arrest. Here are the decisions where various High Courts have taken conflicting views: . High Court.

Copyright 137

Copyright Ownership Copyright Infringement Law 137

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 25, 2022

Regarding the material component, SME jobs helped rural residents raise and maintain their income, gave them equal access to, control over, and ownership of assets, and allowed them to access high-quality services for health care, nutrition, and education.

Business 86

Business Government Ownership Design 86

The TTABlog

APRIL 6, 2022

Illyrian Import claimed to be the exclusive authorized distributor and brand agent of a company ("GKS") that continuously sold GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU and SKËNDERBEU brandy in the United States since 2002. Fraud: Illyrian alleged that ADOL committed fraud by falsely claiming ownership of the subject marks. See also Chem.

Ownership 52

Ownership Registration Trademark Contracts 52

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

Section 3(j) was introduced through the 2002 amendment to the Patents Act to meet India’s TRIPS obligation under Article 27 [Patentable Subject Matter]. Reviewing this provision to include patenting discovery of non-living substances tips the fine balance that currently exists in the patent regime and over-extends monopoly rights.

Reporting 108

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 108

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 17, 2024

The aspect of ownership in this regard narrows the scope of the application of Copyright Act. 893 of 2002 (Del) (India). [2] Personality rights must be treated with a different approach than considering one’s likeness as property as the object concerned is so intrinsically connected with oneself. 2] CS (COMM) 819 of 2022. [3]

Personality Rights 96

Personality Rights Intellectual Property Social Media Intellectual Property Law 96

SpicyIP

AUGUST 23, 2024

Because of such community ownership, the legislature denies exclusive monopoly rights to inventions incorporating traditional knowledge ” (Para 10). The legislators sought that no foreigner take “advantage” (biopiracy) of Indian TK [Shri Kharabela Swain on page 15 of Discussion on the Patents (Amendment) Bill, 2002 (Bill passed) ].

Patent 105

Patent Invention Patent Application Art 105

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 17, 2024

Accounting Firms This exemption includes any public accounting firm registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. or abroad, including any ownership interests. Public Utilities This exemption includes any entity that (a) is a regulated public utility defined in 26 U.S.C.

Reporting 52

Reporting Ownership Business Government 52

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

Meanwhile, Rex Exchange, founded in 2015, offers an online platform for homeowners and homebuyers to transact the sale of single-family homes. It first expanded into Austin in 2018. There was no evidence at trial that there had been an assignment by Glendenning to plaintiff. Thus, the §32 claim failed as a matter of law.

Advertising 69

Advertising Advertising Marketing Marketing 69

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

Competition Act, 2002. Merger & Acquisition would subject to The Competition Law, 2002 as well. But despite the acquisition of Myntra by flipkart and flipkart having 100% ownership over it, Myntra still operates as a separate entity in the market. Tata and Corus Steel. billion dollars. Conclusion.

Business 52

Business Marketing Marketing Ownership 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 2, 2022

The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. case in 2002 to the Points Guy case in 2022. Eric’s Comments. Verio, Inc.

Cease and Desist 116

Cease and Desist Contracts Privacy Business 116

The TTABlog

JUNE 28, 2022

Kretet also pointed to its ownership of a registration for a similar mark for non-medicated skin serums, but the Board was unimpressed. 90369855 (June 24, 2002) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. In re Krete LLC , Serial No.

Designs 45

Designs Design Registration Ownership 45

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 29, 2023

Accounting Firms This exemption includes any public accounting firm registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. or abroad, including any ownership interests. Public Utilities This exemption includes any entity that (a) is a regulated public utility defined in 26 U.S.C.

Reporting 52

Reporting Ownership Business Government 52

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024

The suit touched upon a range of issues, including, but not limited to, the Court’s territorial jurisdiction and ownership and infringement of the copyright and trademark subsisting in the said logo. The CEA, it was argued, allowed both the companies to use their respective crocodile logos in different global regions, including India.

Trademark 81

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 81

IIPRD

JUNE 21, 2021

ii] With India steadily coming to grips with concept of digital currency, it is bound to raise questions of ownership, legal protection and Intellectual Property law’s role in as it has been said ‘growth to the moon.’. India’s Crypto Saga. There is special act in place in India for the regulation of Cryptocurrency. Conclusion.

IP 40

IP Ownership Intellectual Property Marketing 40

LexBlog IP

JUNE 9, 2023

In addition to VIP’s statements regarding ownership of the marks, VIP’s use of the mark on product hang tags directly opposite their registered SILLY SQUEAKERS logo also indicates use as a source identifier. 410 (SDNY 2002); United We Stand Am., Grimaldi ) [3] Id. 5] See Harley-Davidson, Inc. Grottanelli , 164 F.3d

Artistic Work 52

Artistic Work Ownership Trademark Licensing 52

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 2, 2023

The “FoxMandal” name and “FM” emblem were created and registered by Mr. Som Mandal in the early months of 2002, and it wasn’t until the partners of Fox& Mandal, including his own father, sought for the registration in 2006 that it was denied by the Trademark Registry. & Anr.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Business Branding 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

[Delhi High Court] On May 23, the Delhi High Court passed an interesting jud gement on the issue of ownership of the copyright in a film screenplay and held that the copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’, lay with Satyajit Ray and on his demise, with his son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA).

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

LexBlog IP

MAY 3, 2022

Ferrero filed a 3D mark in China in 2002 via the international trademark registration system known as the Madrid System, but the application was refused by both the Chinese Trademark Office (which was later replaced by the CNIPA) and its Review and Appeal Board. Unlike the U.S.,

Designs 52

Designs Design Trademark Intellectual Property 52

The TTABlog

DECEMBER 21, 2021

According to Section 2(d), Australian was required to show ownership of a mark "previously used in the United States. He conducted clinical trials in 2000 and manufacturing began in 2002-2003. equally oxymoronic? - and not abandoned." He developed his own formula for a lubricant, as well as special packaging.

Registration 53

Registration Contracts Advertising Advertising 53

The TTABlog

AUGUST 2, 2021

The Board found that Shen knew he was not the owner of the mark, that his false statement of ownership was material to the registration, and that he intended to deceive the USPTO. The false statement of ownership was a material misrepresentation because an application filed by someone who is not the owner is void. Cancellation No.

Registration 40

Registration Ownership Licensing Trademark 40

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2024

” [11] Applying these principles, the Jack Daniel’s Court held that because VIP alleged ownership over the use of its dog toy’s trademark and trade dress, VIP was using them to identify product source. AJ Press, LLC, 52 F.4th 4th 1091, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2022) (“ Punchbowl I” ). [4] citations omitted). [6]

Trademark 40

Trademark Designs Design Registration 40

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made. 01, out/2002, p. A film based on a book serves as an example. O fair use no direito autoral. Revista Forense. 73-74 [5] RUBENFELD, Jed. Yale Law Review, v.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

The TTABlog

JULY 5, 2023

Laches barred both claims as to certain of the goods in light of Applicant Fashion Ele ctronics' ownership of an expired registration for EVOGUE for substantially the same goods. 2002) (“Dilution does not implicate any public interest against consumer deception because, by definition, it protects only a trademark owner’s private interest.”).

Registration 40

Registration Trademark Ownership Advertising 40

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 14, 2023

Since copyright in whatever form (even first ownership) is subject to the territoriality principle, many argue that lex loci protectionis is the appropriate course of action. [10] Since copyright is “universal”, some argue that the lex originis should be utilised to determine who owns works that have been plagiarised.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Law Copyright Intellectual Property 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 7, 2023

Ginsburg began by noting that in 2002 Professor Bill Cornish delivered the Horace S. Jane Ginsburg’s lecture – “Author as Revenue Sharer” Prof. Ginsburg’s lecture took place on 3 May 2023. The full lecture is available on YouTube. A summary is offered below. Manges Lecture at Columbia Law School titled “The Author as Risk-Sharer”.

Contracts 52

Contracts Derivative Work Intellectual Property Music 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 14, 2023

Morford’s Motion for Summary Judgment Morford moved for summary judgment on three grounds [15] : Morford established ownership of a valid copyright. Morford’s claim is barred by the copyright doctrine of merger. Cattelan copied constituted elements of Morford’s work that are original. 22] The banana is a real banana. [23]

Art 52

Art Copyright Copying Art Law 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002. The agreement lays down conditions for patent ownership in the event of default. Case Studies.

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Business Branding 40

SpicyIP

JULY 29, 2021

The question of copyrightability of fonts first came up for judicial consideration in 2002, before the Copyright Board in Re Anand Expanded Italics wherein the Board held that fonts are not copyrightable. Some of the reasons put forth by the Board in support of this decision has found support outside of this order as well.

Copyright 126

Copyright Artistic Work Copyright Law Law 126

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Previously, IPilogue reported that Australia has granted patent ownership to an AI inventor. While DABUS’ patent application is still developing in Canada, the recent reversal of the Australian decision will likely impact the future of patent ownership rights of AI. In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,

Invention 110

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 110

Kluwer Copyright Blog

APRIL 17, 2024

In addition to raising questions about ownership of outputs , infringement in training , and the future of copyright as a policy tool to encourage creativity , economists are in the early stages of analysing the effects of these technologies on human creativity.

Artistic Work 104

Artistic Work Registration Copyright Ownership 104

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 3, 2021

Interestingly, the court also distinguished between ownership and inventorship , emphasizing that only humans can be capable of ownership, but inventorship only requires the capacity to invent, which AI arguably possesses. 2002 SCC 77 (“Apotex”). Patent Law in Canada. When defining this term, experts refer to Apotex Inc.

Inventor 105

Inventor Patent Law Law Patent 105

IPilogue

JANUARY 30, 2023

Famous for its easily-recognizable design of breathable and water-friendly clogs, Crocs was founded in 2002 in the US by three college friends who enjoyed sailing. The intellectual property rights victory in Canada for the footwear company Crocs is a timely reminder to keep fleece clogs in mind for your winter wardrobe.

Intellectual Property 105

Intellectual Property Designs Design Design Patent 105

43(B)log

AUGUST 4, 2023

Partly in response to NJ’s 2002 law—once there’s a smart gun, manufacturers have to switch to it w/in 30 months, though NJ backed off and just required retailers to stock it, but still infuriated gun rights advocates who boycotted Colt and Smith & Wesson who then got out of the market entirely. Canada, Bill C-11 passed.

Copyright 52

Copyright Fair Use Marketing Marketing 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 6, 2021

2002); TMEP §§ 904.07(b) Trademark practitioners should anticipate IP issues involving NFTs to involve ownership, transfer, and assignments. . §§ 1051 – 1052 , 1127 ; see Herbko Int’l, Inc. Kappa Books, Inc. , 3d 1156, 1162-63 (Fed. b) , 1202.08. IP Issues With NFT Trademarks.

Trademark 52

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Registration IP 52

IPilogue

JANUARY 14, 2022

Copyright Ownership of Movies and Films in Canada: Who’s on First? The Supreme Court of Canada last considered the definition of “inventor” in 2002, but has yet to consider whether it would include non-human entities. Giuseppina D’Agostino. IP Innovation Clinic ChatBot Launch Event by Bonnie Hassanzadeh. By Meena Alnajar.

IP 105

IP Copyright Infringement Inventor Intellectual Property 105

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2023

Hiranandani Hospital 2014 reveal that Big Tech may participate in agreements that qualify as anti-competitive under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 but as opposed to its contemporaries, CCI has adopted a rather deferential approach as evidenced by its clearance of tying-in arrangements in aforementioned cases.

Marketing 52

Marketing Marketing Cease and Desist Technology 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. After negotiations between them fell apart, both parties sued, each claiming exclusive ownership of the movie footage. The court held that because each of them was seeking a declaration of sole ownership, the parties could not be joint authors. 1332 ].

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131