Remove 2002 Remove Marketing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Evaluating the efficacy of Competition Commission Amendment Act, 2023

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction Incorporating a novel focus on the digital market environment, the Competition Amendment Act, 2023 stands out as one of the most momentous changes made to the Competition Act of 2002 in the last two decades. The modifications intend to modify the 2002 Competition Act. This promotes transparency and teamwork.

Marketing 105
article thumbnail

Competition Amendment Bill, 2022

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction On August 5, 2022, the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2022, to amend the Competition Act, 2002, was introduced in the Indian Parliament. The timing of approval of the Bill, and its coming into effect, is uncertain at present. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Competition Amendment Bill, 2022 first appeared on IPLF.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A General Analysis on Mergers And Acquisitions

IP and Legal Filings

To create global consumer interference along with the profit from it, is now the primary objective of majority of the markets. In our country, securities market is basically run and controlled by SEBI i.e. The Securities and Exchange Board of India. Competition Act, 2002. Gaining access to new markets. Case Study.

article thumbnail

5th Circuit holds that inquiries weigh less than lost sales but can still be evidence of actual confusion

43(B)log

If consumers believe, even though falsely, that the natural tendency of producers of the type of goods marketed by the prior user is to expand into the market for the type of goods marketed by the subsequent user, confusion may be likely.” It first expanded into Austin in 2018. Thus, the §32 claim failed as a matter of law. “If

article thumbnail

The Corporate Transparency Act (Part 2): Exemptions from the Reporting Requirements

LexBlog IP

Accounting Firms This exemption includes any public accounting firm registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. or abroad, including any ownership interests. Public Utilities This exemption includes any entity that (a) is a regulated public utility defined in 26 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 11: TTAB Dismisses SKËNDERBEU Brandy Opposition for Failure to Prove Priority and Fraud

The TTABlog

Illyrian Import claimed to be the exclusive authorized distributor and brand agent of a company ("GKS") that continuously sold GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU and SKËNDERBEU brandy in the United States since 2002. Fraud: Illyrian alleged that ADOL committed fraud by falsely claiming ownership of the subject marks. See also Chem.

article thumbnail

The Culmination of a Saga: How the Delhi HC Resolved the Two-Decade Long ‘Lacoste v. Crocodile International’ Impasse

SpicyIP

The suit touched upon a range of issues, including, but not limited to, the Court’s territorial jurisdiction and ownership and infringement of the copyright and trademark subsisting in the said logo. For global brands like Lacoste, the wait might be bearable given their strong financial backing and established market presence.