IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

To create global consumer interference along with the profit from it, is now the primary objective of majority of the markets. In our country, securities market is basically run and controlled by SEBI i.e. The Securities and Exchange Board of India. Competition Act, 2002. Gaining access to new markets. Case Study.

Business 52

Business Marketing Marketing Ownership 52

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024

The suit touched upon a range of issues, including, but not limited to, the Court’s territorial jurisdiction and ownership and infringement of the copyright and trademark subsisting in the said logo. For global brands like Lacoste, the wait might be bearable given their strong financial backing and established market presence.

Trademark 81

Trademark Branding Branding Brands 81

SpicyIP

MARCH 9, 2025

PPL, claiming ownership over public performance rights via assignments from music labels, alleged infringement after its representatives discovered unlicensed use of its repertoire. Later, he discovered the trademark had expired since 2002 without prior notice, violating Rule 58(3) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Karan Johar v.

Trademark 59

Trademark Patent Copyright Patent Application 59

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

It further recommends making available these patents to farmers at a subsidized rate and charging market value for private players. Section 3(j) was introduced through the 2002 amendment to the Patents Act to meet India’s TRIPS obligation under Article 27 [Patentable Subject Matter]. Article 27.3(b)

Reporting 108

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 108

The TTABlog

APRIL 6, 2022

Illyrian Import claimed to be the exclusive authorized distributor and brand agent of a company ("GKS") that continuously sold GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU and SKËNDERBEU brandy in the United States since 2002. Fraud: Illyrian alleged that ADOL committed fraud by falsely claiming ownership of the subject marks. See also Chem.

Ownership 52

Ownership Registration Trademark Contracts 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 2, 2022

The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. case in 2002 to the Points Guy case in 2022. LinkedIn appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Verio, Inc.

Cease and Desist 116

Cease and Desist Contracts Privacy Business 116

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 17, 2024

Accounting Firms This exemption includes any public accounting firm registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. or abroad, including any ownership interests. Public Utilities This exemption includes any entity that (a) is a regulated public utility defined in 26 U.S.C.

Reporting 52

Reporting Ownership Business Government 52

IIPRD

JUNE 21, 2021

[i] Since then multitudes of different crypto currencies coming into existence, 10,295 different crypto currencies to be precise according to market cap and this number is still bound to increase. [ii] This move wreaked havoc in the market leading prices to fall due to people selling their holding in India. ii] Coin Market Cap, [link].

IP 40

IP Ownership Intellectual Property Marketing 40

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 29, 2023

Accounting Firms This exemption includes any public accounting firm registered under Section 102 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. or abroad, including any ownership interests. Public Utilities This exemption includes any entity that (a) is a regulated public utility defined in 26 U.S.C.

Reporting 52

Reporting Ownership Business Government 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

[Delhi High Court] On May 23, the Delhi High Court passed an interesting jud gement on the issue of ownership of the copyright in a film screenplay and held that the copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’, lay with Satyajit Ray and on his demise, with his son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA).

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

LexBlog IP

JUNE 9, 2023

In addition to VIP’s statements regarding ownership of the marks, VIP’s use of the mark on product hang tags directly opposite their registered SILLY SQUEAKERS logo also indicates use as a source identifier. 410 (SDNY 2002); United We Stand Am., Grimaldi ) [3] Id. 5] See Harley-Davidson, Inc. Grottanelli , 164 F.3d

Artistic Work 52

Artistic Work Ownership Trademark Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 3, 2022

Ferrero filed a 3D mark in China in 2002 via the international trademark registration system known as the Madrid System, but the application was refused by both the Chinese Trademark Office (which was later replaced by the CNIPA) and its Review and Appeal Board. Unlike the U.S.,

Design 52

Design Designs Trademark Intellectual Property 52

The TTABlog

AUGUST 2, 2021

The Board found that Shen knew he was not the owner of the mark, that his false statement of ownership was material to the registration, and that he intended to deceive the USPTO. The false statement of ownership was a material misrepresentation because an application filed by someone who is not the owner is void. Cancellation No.

Registration 40

Registration Ownership Licensing Trademark 40

43(B)log

AUGUST 4, 2023

Room 204 Christopher Buccafusco (w/ Joseph Blocher), Firearms, Innovation, and Regulation How do law and markets affect the pace and direction of innovation for firearm related safety in the US? But none reached the market despite millions in R&D from National Institute of Justice. Costly inefficiencies in supply and demand.

Copyright 52

Copyright Fair Use Marketing Marketing 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2024

” [11] Applying these principles, the Jack Daniel’s Court held that because VIP alleged ownership over the use of its dog toy’s trademark and trade dress, VIP was using them to identify product source. AJ Press, LLC, 52 F.4th 4th 1091, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2022) (“ Punchbowl I” ). [4] citations omitted). [6]

Trademark 40

Trademark Designs Design Registration 40

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made. 01, out/2002, p. A film based on a book serves as an example. In the case at stake, the U.S. O fair use no direito autoral. Revista Forense. Yale Law Review, v.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 7, 2023

Ginsburg began by noting that in 2002 Professor Bill Cornish delivered the Horace S. As a result, the CMA reported last year that it was not going to launch a market investigation. Jane Ginsburg’s lecture – “Author as Revenue Sharer” Prof. Ginsburg’s lecture took place on 3 May 2023. The full lecture is available on YouTube.

Contracts 52

Contracts Derivative Work Intellectual Property Music 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

The risks include unauthorised use and infringement, technological obsolescence, and the marketable nature of IP as collateral. Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002.

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Business Branding 40

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2023

This expanding impact of Big Tech within and outside the market has regulators increasingly concerned about economic problems, prevention of competition, data privacy issues, media domination as well as political concerns, and even the democratic process itself. Demystification of Shri Sonam Sharma v Apple Inc. &

Marketing 52

Marketing Marketing Cease and Desist Technology 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 31, 2024

Here Under Armour filed an application for injunction against the Defendants from selling, manufacturing, marketing and dealing in any manner with the wordmark AERO ARMOUR and / or AERO ARMR. The Rules supersede the Biological Diversity Rules, 2004, and have been created supplementing the 2023 amendment to the Biological Diversity Act, 2002.

IP 105

IP Invention Patent Copyright 105

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. After negotiations between them fell apart, both parties sued, each claiming exclusive ownership of the movie footage. The court held that because each of them was seeking a declaration of sole ownership, the parties could not be joint authors. 1332 ].

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131